
Swedish fashion girl mocked after clumsy photo editing
Friday 21 December 2018, 08:16 by Michelle Peeters | 7,483 views | 5 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
I took one photo and didn't think it was very nice ... so I put a different background behind it. And when I posted it on Instagram, nobody noticed, so I thought it was fine.

The Swedish fashion influencer Johanna Olsson(28) is under fire because a large number of fashion photos on her Instagram account appear to be fake. The blonde visited Paris a few months ago on an all-expenses-paid trip.
Photos from her trip led to more than just a few raised eyebrows. That is because it was obvious, even to a casual observer, that the photos were nothing more than the result of somewhat clumsy Photoshopping.
Many of her more than half a million followers are seriously disappointed in Johanna, who earns good money from her photos. She is paid well by major clothing and cosmetics companies when she poses with their products. Many followers think this is unfair, because she is showing a reality that does not exist at all.
In one of the photos, Johanna can be seen on a bridge over the Seine in Paris. If you look closely, you can see that Johanna is floating above the road and has no shadow. The other photos also appear to have been manipulated. The lighting is often wrong and backgrounds do not match the foregrounds.

Johanna was asked to explain the controversial photos. She insisted that she really had been to Paris. Something her followers now seriously doubt. Which photos are real and which are fake? Nobody knows anymore...
She subsequently lost a large number of fans. According to her, she is certainly not the only one who 'messes around' with photos.
There are hundreds of colleagues around the world who do the same thing to look better in pictures. I did indeed fiddle with those Paris photos a little. And, admittedly, I have not yet completely mastered the photo-editing programme.
Recently, according to her fans, she went wrong again. She shared fashion photos that were supposedly taken in snowy Switzerland. The reactions left nothing to the imagination. Sadly, once again one hundred per cent fake, and unfortunately you still can't Photoshop. Johanna herself says she does not yet have enough money to hire a good photo editor. That will come eventually, she promises.
Want to know more about Photoshop editing?
If you want to know more about, among other things, neatly cutting out a subject, adding shadows and many more Photoshop ins and outs, take a look at Photofacts Academy. You can access the following courses here:
- Photoshop for Beginners (Johan Elzenga)
- Photoshop for Photographers (Piet van den Eynde)
- Photoshop for Advanced Users (Marit Hilarius)
- Photoshop Effects (Elja Trum)
And much more...
You can take these courses for two weeks with a free trial membership.

About the author
Michelle Peeters is fotografe en oprichter van DeuxBleus Fotografie. Michelle herkent het bijzondere in het gewone en het gewone in het bijzondere. Ze heeft zich nooit willen specialiseren en is daardoor van alle markten thuis.
You might also like
-
Fashion photo tip: Visualise your concept with a moodboardby Anniek Snoeijs
-
Photo recipe: the laundry girlby Elja Trum
-
Milestone: 30 years of Photoshop!by Michelle Peeters
-
Fashion photo tip: Work with people around you as modelsby Anniek Snoeijs
-
Photoshop tip: Using a clipping maskby Nando Harmsen
5 comments
-
guest wrote on Tuesday 25 December 2018 at 12:36 | replyIt's always (!) a mess with that after editing. Learn how to make a regular photo properly.
Translated from Dutch. -
A. Maas wrote on Thursday 27 December 2018 at 12:17 | replyI also know someone who is always busy post-processing his photos. I always find the result terribly bad.
Translated from Dutch.
Learn to control your camera better instead of pixel peeping. Or ... buy a Fuji the JPg's are always sparkling with color. -

Donald Willemsen
wrote on Saturday 5 January 2019 at 00:06
| reply
Two generalizing contributions so far. What's wrong with post-processing in Photoshop (Ps). If you shoot in RAW, you do have to post-process. If you then use Ps or Lr for post-processing, you should do it properly too. So first take a few decent courses, then practice a lot and gain experience, and only then do you get around to publishing your photos. By the way, I don't call giving a photo a different background 'post-processing'. In my opinion, that's 'manipulating', creating the suggestion that..............
Translated from Dutch. -

Michelle Peeters wrote on Saturday 5 January 2019 at 00:12
| reply
@Donald: agreed! But in this case someone was sent on a trip for a lot of money to be photographed at a specific location wearing specific items of clothing. If you then disregard that and also badly manipulate photos yourself (a good photo editor was apparently too expensive?), then you're not really doing a good job...
Translated from Dutch. -

Donald Willemsen
wrote on Saturday 5 January 2019 at 11:00
| reply
@Michelle, that's right. I therefore condemn such conduct. But I think it's going too far to lump 'post-processing' and 'manipulation' in Ps together.
Translated from Dutch.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
38,937 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum


