
Flash, Sunlight and Backlight
Sunday 11 December 2022, 20:02 by Erik van Rosmalen | 5,668 views | 5 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
Flash or natural light? You don't have to choose. Combining the two gives you plenty of options.
I've never found flash photography particularly exciting. In my commercial work, mainly commercial photography or portraits during interviews, I almost always use flash.
Nine times out of ten, you end up somewhere where you have to make do with fluorescent light. In terms of both colour and direction, straight from above, it isn't very flattering.
In my personal work, I consciously consider whether I need flash. Beautiful low sunlight often doesn't need anything extra, for example.
A portrait against a white or light grey wall? That gives you lovely, soft reflected light to make a portrait with. There are plenty of options for working without flash.
I often combine the two as well. The sunlight sometimes acts as the main light, the most important light on my model, and sometimes as fill light or mood light. By balancing the two, you still get a 'believable' image without it looking flashed.
Recently, I was in the centre of 's-Hertogenbosch with Emma late on a Sunday morning. There was some lovely sunshine, although of course it was no longer very low towards the end of the morning. We still wanted to use it, though. And there are several ways to do that!
Backlight and fill flash
As you can see from the shadows of Emma and the buildings, the light is coming from almost straight in front of me. It isn't quite falling into the camera. The sun does give Emma a lovely hair light and a rim light on her faux fur coat, though.

There is a flash with a small octabox on the left side of the street, just outside the frame. It makes sure that Emma is lit sufficiently.
With the light
Would you photograph with the sun, with the sun behind you as the photographer? You can, but it usually doesn't look very good. See the example below. It wasn't Emma's fault. But the light is very hard, and you can see little difference between the tones, which makes the image look rather flat.

And getting Emma to look into the camera doesn't work this way either. You get very narrowed eyes. On top of that, both the foreground and background are lit harshly, which doesn't produce an interesting photograph.
Backlight as fill light
Hard light isn't always wrong, though. Especially with the outfit Emma had brought, I saw some possibilities. I thought the fur coat, jewellery and shiny leather-look skirt called for some characteristic, 'brutally' hard light.

In this photograph, the flash is positioned fairly frontally towards Emma. The stand is just beside the camera. Still with the small octabox, but because the flash is a little further away, the light is harder. The result: lovely reflections from the clothing, while the sun still provides rim light, including on the extra on the right.
The look becomes a little more 'fashion'. To develop that further, a make-up artist could help reduce the hot spots on the cheeks, which you get a little more quickly with frontal light.

This photograph was taken a few seconds later. Emma and I moved two steps to the right, so the light was coming slightly more from the side again.
This means the light comes more from the side and you use the fall-off from the softbox. The result: slightly softer light again, while the sunlight still separates her dark coat from the background.
Or without flash
Working this way lets you combine flash and sunlight in different ways. And sometimes? You don't even need the flash. On the way back to the car, we saw sunlight falling into an alley. By placing Emma half in and half out of the sun, we made this final portrait.


About the author
Erik werkt als content specialist. Daarnaast is hij freelance tekstschrijver en fotograaf. Mensen vormen daarbij het hoofdonderwerp: portret- en reportage-fotografie. Volg Erik ook op Instagram!
You might also like
-
Fill a boring sky with somethingby Nando Harmsen
-
New in Photoshop Beta: Generative Fillby Nando Harmsen
-
Everything about Generative Fill in Photoshop Betaby Nando Harmsen
-
Flash photography tip: Create your own warm sunlightby Elja Trum
-
Adobe and the cost of AI generative fillby Nando Harmsen
-
Using Generative Fill for Property Photographyby Elja Trum
5 comments
-
Henk wrote on Tuesday 13 December 2022 at 16:01 | replyBeautiful lady, but also beautiful light. You actually can't see that flash was used! And I think that's the best flash light. When you can't see it. Beautiful!
Translated from Dutch. -
guest wrote on Wednesday 14 December 2022 at 07:41 | replyErik, I think it's a good story. Great explanation with excellent photos to support your story. Those photos clearly show the effect of the combination of natural light and flash, also clearly showing what the flash does when positioned in relation to the model.
Translated from Dutch.
The third photo appeals to me the least because of the harsh light. It gives the impression that the model and the extra in the photo are 'pasted' in. Of course that's not the case, but it gives me the feeling a bit that the model isn't standing in her surroundings, but is completely detached from them. With the photos with soft light icht I have that feeling much less, and the surroundings in which the model is standing become more part of the overall image. It is part of the atmosphere.
Don't get me wrong. It's not negative criticism, but a feeling that comes up in me when I look at the photos.
In any case, your explanation is valuable and will help many people move forward in their photography. -

ErikvanRosmalen
wrote on Wednesday 14 December 2022 at 09:23
| reply
Thanks for your responses!
Translated from Dutch.
@Henk:
Thank you. If you use flash properly, then you shouldn't be able to see it anyway. Or the other way around: people who say they don't use flash 'because it's ugly', they should try using flash in a different way when it's needed
@guest:
Thanks for your extensive response. And I don't see it as criticism, no problem. It's a thought or feeling. Personally, I also usually prefer that softer light. But it's a style.
Or actually (if all goes well, at least) a conscious choice: depending on the story you want to tell. For the story of Emma strolling through the city on a sunny day, I choose the soft light. But if I have to sell these clothes for a campaign? Then that harder light is better, because it emphasizes those clothes more. -
Donald Willemsen wrote on Wednesday 14 December 2022 at 16:05 | reply@Erik, that guy was me, Donald Willemsen, who responded at length. Apparently something isn't working properly with logging in to the site.
Translated from Dutch.
But I still wanted to respond to your comment. You're right that when the photo has to be taken for the sale of the clothing (I would tell the model not to do that, just keep it for yourself) then hard light is indeed desirable. The conclusion is therefore: what purpose is the photo being taken for? That determines what the photo should look like. You will probably also choose a different setting then, and not that beautiful soft morning light.
But once again, your story is clear. Your approach and vision really resonate with me. I can relate to it well -

ErikvanRosmalen
wrote on Thursday 15 December 2022 at 08:50
| reply
Hi Donald,
Translated from Dutch.
Yes, light, atmosphere, location, decor, they are all choices. I've seen clothing brands do crazier things in that regard
The bottom line is indeed to make those choices consciously and not let them arise by chance!
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,179 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum

