LED versus flash: which is better?

Wednesday 8 July 2026, 20:10 by Elja Trum | 1,028 views | 0 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

LED lights have improved considerably in recent years. They are more powerful, have better colour accuracy and, thanks to modern cameras, you can now also work comfortably at higher ISO settings. I still prefer using flash, and in this video John Gress agrees with me.

In the video, John explains why continuous light, such as LED lighting, certainly has its advantages, but also has clear limitations.

One important point is that with LED light, you are much more dependent on the existing light in the room. That is not a problem in a completely dark studio, but on location you often have to deal with fluorescent tubes, office lighting or daylight. These light sources can affect the colours in your photo, for example by causing yellow or green shadows.

Flash is often more practical outdoors too. If you want to photograph against the sun or really take control of the ambient light, LED light soon leaves you short of power. With flash, it is much easier to overpower the existing light and decide for yourself what your final image will look like.

Another major advantage of flash is freezing movement. Think of children running through the studio, dancers, athletes or hair moving in front of a fan.

With LED light, you need a very fast shutter speed for this, which often means working at a higher ISO or with a wider aperture. Flash can freeze movement through its short flash duration, while allowing you to continue working at a low ISO. This immediately gives you a cleaner file, with less noise.

Modern AI software, such as the noise reduction and sharpening tools in Lightroom, Capture One or Topaz Photo AI, makes the difference between high and low ISO smaller. Even so, it is still nicer to get the cleanest possible image straight from the camera, rather than having to apply extra corrections afterwards.

John also discusses your model's comfort. Increasingly powerful LED lights may seem like the solution, but bright continuous light right in front of someone's face is not always pleasant. People start squinting more quickly and it can get quite hot. With flash, your model is much less bothered by this, because the powerful light is visible for only a very short time.

That does not mean LED lighting has no place. It is, of course, indispensable for video. Continuous light can also be very useful for product photography, hybrid shoots, learning to understand light and creative colour accents. The major advantage is that you can immediately see what the light is doing.

John is nuanced in his conclusion: if you have both flash and LED light, use both. Each system has its own strengths.

But if you can only buy one set of lights as a photographer, flash is often the most versatile choice. Mainly because it is better suited to dealing with difficult ambient light, can freeze movement and lets you photograph your subject more comfortably.

You might also like

• 

  Elinchrom announces LED 100 C continuous light

  by Elja Trum

• 

  Review: SmallRig RM 40C mini LED video light

  by Nando Harmsen

• 

  Review: SmallRig RM-03 Macro Photography LED lights

  by Nando Harmsen

• 

  Creating high-key portraits with LED lighting

  by Elja Trum

• 

  Flash photography tip: Flash brightness is indicated by its power

  by Elja Trum

• 

  Video: Add drama to your photos with colour and smoke

  by Elja Trum

0 comments

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.