All categories | Sort by date, popularity, latest comments
weerd wrote yesterday at 23:14
@Mc5, a manual would be very welcome, I am beginning to appreciate the program more and more.
Translated from Dutch.
Mc5 wrote yesterday at 18:47
If you want I can share an "in development" manual.
is not finished, but I'm so happy with this tool that I spend time on it, just let me know.

Mc5 wrote yesterday at 18:46
Yes, that - it works perfectly for me and especially faster than in e.g. LrC. and yes, it's not finished yet, there are still quite a few glitches in it, but as I wrote earlier, the developer is quick, thinks things through carefully and always responds. I'm still a fan of it.
By the way, I recently provided the translation so that a NL version will also be available in the next release.
Rob, with just 1 flash you can already do really cool things d do. I’m going to get back to work with it too. You can call it studio photography. I call it 'bad weather photography' 😀
Translated from Dutch.I don't know the exact prices, but for purely taking photographs you don't need the fastest cards, so you can do what Bernard wrote, and what I do too.
My first cards were 1 Gb for 10 euros, the original photos are still on them
Videos were much more expensive, but they are not reusable.
Indeed, the story applies less to xqd or Cf (express) cards, which are considerably more expensive, but still less expensive than a comparable amount of film ( +development costs)
In my view, the original cards are therefore the best backup
Rob Zwart wrote on Thursday 8 October 2026 at 09:50
Thanks for the compliment. And you are right it is a manipulation. It can't be any other way if you photograph it from a dining nook table.
For me it was mainly about how you can already make a beautiful presentation with just 1 flash. And everything isn't perfect no and the Bold Eagle could indeed have been a bit smaller.
Call and idea was from the start to just do it and try. To have fun with the fact that the end product is still nice to look at 
The idea is good in itself. The only question is whether everything is correct in terms of perspective and DoF. In both end results, it is noticeable that they are manipulations. Nothing wrong with that, but then the perspective does need to be somewhat correct. The Bold Eagle feels a bit too large to me and rendered too sharply.
I do find the creativity very appealing. Nice idea.
By the way, I have also done something like this with rum, but the problem was that with a partially filled glass, the background remained visible through the glass when I used another photo as the background. I couldn't solve it.
I also work with Canon and gladly so. I will not switch to another brand because of the high costs, since you then have to trade in/sell everything.
There is another reason. A professional photographer in particular will work with a camera that he/she knows well, can find all the buttons on blindly and knows how quickly settings can be set and adjusted. A professional photographer cannot afford blunders on an assignment.
Color is often a subjective matter. One person wants a color to look as you see it in reality and the other likes seeing saturated colors.
What strikes me is that many people find the colors of postcards very beautiful and when they look at photos, they also like those saturated colors. If it deviates, they no longer look.
As a photographer or photographic artist, you want to fill in the colors in a photo according to your own taste and experience. You mainly take photos for yourself, but of course not to put them in the cupboard or leave them sitting pointlessly on the PC.
You also want to show them to the general public (usually via social media). Possibly even to be able to earn something from them.
I personally believe that you should reproduce the colors as naturally as possible.
There is one exception and that is if you want to deal with colors in a more creative way and, for example, apply solarization. There are of course more creative possibilities.

RCJB59 wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 15:14
🤣
Translated from Dutch.
Nando
wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 14:47
Misfortune never comes alone. 

RCJB59 wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 11:47
That’s true, but it’s still just a little better than a drive in your PC. A friend who works as a system administrator was once called in a panic by a customer who had a NAS with 5 or six drives. One drive was defective and they figured they’d just replace it themselves. Except for one drive, they all failed one after another. So miracles do still happen.
Translated from Dutch.I bought my first camera, the Canon Ftb, when I was seventeen, and I enjoyed it for many years. At that time Nikon had the reputation of being "a little better". With the arrival of the DSLR I bought my first Nikon. Why? Simply because it felt a little more pleasant in my hand and because I found all the functions I needed fairly instinctively. And then it turned out that Canon had built up a certain lead. And somewhat later SONY built up an undeniably strong reputation. I am now 73 and I still work with Nikon, not because I find it better than a Canon or a SONY, but indeed because it still feels a bit like coming home when I take one of my cameras in my hand. I am still convinced that a successful photo does not come rolling out of a specific camera, but that the photographer and the appropriate post-processing certainly determine an equally large part of the quality of the photo.
Translated from Dutch.
weerd wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 11:03
@ Nando
It works really well, but there are still limitations. I find the sorting function impressively fast and the selection questions are saved.
Nando
wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 10:12
Note, a NAS is not a backup. Set to mirror, it does provide some backup, but it is still in the same little box.
Translated from Dutch.
Nando
wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 10:11
If we go back even further: the Sony Mavica with floppy disks. Photos not quite at VGA resolution yet 😎
Translated from Dutch.
RCJB59 wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 09:55
Because of a big assignment in 1996, I could afford a Minolta RD-175 with 'a whopping' 1.75 million pixels. 🤣
Translated from Dutch.
RCJB59 wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 09:52
I have always had two drives in my PCs and when the NAS came out, that was quite a relief after all.
Translated from Dutch.
Nando
wrote on Wednesday 7 October 2026 at 09:43
A 64GB SD card for around 20 euros isn't a fast card. If you don't need the speed, that's fine of course.
But a slightly faster card actually costs between 3 and 5 times as much.
If your camera needs a CF Express or XQD card, it doesn't work at all anymore.
Don't be mistaken. When you reach 1TB of storage, that's 15 cards. That's 300 euros.
You can get a simple (but slow) external SSD for half that amount.
However, if the system you use works for you, perfect, right?