Don’t always choose the lowest viewpoint for your landscape photo

The viewpoint is often the problem for me. I discovered that again when I was doing street photography. The people appeared in the photo photographed from below. Sometimes that can produce a beautiful photo, but I don't think it's nice to have the whole series like that. How does that happen? Outside on the street I mainly use a wheelchair to get around. So you have a low viewpoint. Taking photos standing up only works if I can lean against something. Standing still without support doesn't work because I always get motion blur then. To a large extent I can compensate for that with a monopod. A tripod would be even better. But can you see me driving around in a wheelchair and also taking a tripod along?
I usually can't take the viewpoint I would like. When I publish photos, I sometimes get heaps of (justified) criticism thrown at me, like: wouldn't it have been better to stand a little higher, or had you had you not better taken a step to the left/right, or if you had taken this photo flat on your stomach the photo would have been much better and more of those kinds of comments. Nobody knows under what circumstances a photo was taken, but still people feel the need to give well-intentioned advice.
Sometimes I get so tired of that. My mobility is such that I can't just climb onto a rock to get the best shot or even take a step forward/backward, left/right. Having to explain again and again what my circumstances were at the time. There are plenty of places that are inaccessible to me because of my mobility to get the best shot.
And yet, yet I am able to take beautiful photos despite my limited ability to take a good viewpoint.
A photo is more than just a little higher/lower, left/right. A photo also has division of planes, colours, composition and, not to forget, atmosphere. These elements also help determine whether it is a beautiful/good photo or not.
I think the viewer looking at a photo should ask themselves: what motivated the photographer to take the photo as it is instead of 'I would have taken a step to the left/right.'

I like the third photo best and why: there is more detail in the area between the ridges and the cliff in the background. This forms a connection between the foreground and the background. Moreover, the sky is smaller in height, from which a certain calm emanates that contrasts with the dynamics of the foreground. But, in this landscape the foreground should dominate and not the sky.

A beautiful photo like this with that cliff in the background would in my opinion have more dynamism with a bit of the sea included I would like to see what causes those beautiful ripples in the sand??

Dear Donald, unfortunately I suffer from that too. But if you publish a photo, tell them right away how and what, people can't smell/know what kind of problems/ailments the maker has to deal with

Some people look at a photo sooooo technically that sometimes afterward they don't know what was actually in the photo!

Martin, I totally agree with you, I was a member of photo clubs for years and left them for this reason.
I now let my inspiration do its work and if a photo is good for me then the goal has been achieved. What the others think of it leaves me completely cold.