Nando Harmsen

Be creative when photographing your subject

Saturday 28 June 2025, 16:08 by | 2,669 views | 4 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

Have you seen something you'd like to photograph? Don't just point your camera at it and take the shot. Think about composition and framing. Look around carefully first and consider the possibilities. Make a choice before taking the photo.

As an example, I am using a pigeonnier I saw in the Tarn in France. A pigeonnier is a tower for pigeons, whose droppings were used to fertilise the vineyards. This was a fine example, standing on little legs.

Nando Tarn 2025 landscape

The pigeonnier in the field, with the church tower of the village behind it. I don't want the church tower in the frame, only the pigeonnier.

Behind the field is a village with a proud church tower rising above everything else. I choose not to include it in the frame so that the pigeonnier gets all the attention. I choose a focal length, a clear view, and take a snapshot.

Nando Tarn 2025 pigeonnier 2

You can simply point the camera at the pigeonnier and photograph it. But that will be nothing more than a snapshot. It needs to be better.

Although this snapshot isn't wrong, it creates little tension in the image. It is just a photo of a pigeonnier, nothing more. So I look around further and see a tree that could serve as a nice subject in the foreground. It adds depth and allows me to hide the church tower behind it.

Nando Tarn 2025 pigeonnier focal length

A tree in the foreground is already more interesting. It adds depth and fills the image more. But choosing a wide angle makes the tree more important.

As the field is next to the road, I am standing close to the tree. With a wide angle, I get both the tree and the pigeonnier in the photo. But the latter is further away and therefore small in the frame. The attention is now entirely on the tree.

Nando Tarn 2025 pigeonnier focal length 2

Using more telephoto has made the pigeonnier larger in the frame. The focal point here is the pigeonnier.

I decide to stand on the other side of the road and choose a longer focal length. This keeps the tree almost the same size in the frame, but the pigeonnier appears much larger. The result is that the pigeonnier now gets all the attention.


I decide to walk around once more. I can't enter the field itself, so I am limited to standing on the road. But I find a gap through the trees. Unfortunately, the church tower is positioned exactly behind the pigeonnier. Here too, standing further away and using a longer focal length helps. I manage to hide the church tower.

Nando Tarn 2025 pigeonnier

The gap through the trees gives a completely different view of the pigeonnier. It took some puzzling to hide the church tower in the background behind the leaves and the pigeonnier.

Remember that this isn't about right or wrong. The most important thing is what you, as a photographer, like. But you have to work that out when you are there.

The advice is, don't just take a photo of a subject. By looking around carefully first, you can often photograph a subject in a more beautiful or interesting way. Even with whatever limitations there may be.

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Nando Harmsen

About the author

Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.

Show every article in Tutorials

4 comments

  1. Donald Willemsen
    Donald Willemsen wrote on Saturday 28 June 2025 at 21:44  | reply

    Nando, ik vind het een leerzaam verhaal, maar tegelijkertijd ook een subjectief verhaal. Wat jij al of niet een spannende foto vindt, kan voor een andere fotograaf heel anders liggen. Dat is niet verkeerd, hoor. Maar de meningen zijn verdeeld. Een discussie daarover is moeilijk te voeren. Over smaak valt nu eenmaal niet te twisten.
    Vaak wordt verwezen naar voorbeelden van hedendaagse fotografen. Als je dan een naam noemt van een fotograaf uit het verleden dan wordt je met een blik van: Over wie heb je het in gods naam.
    Visies veranderen in de loop van de tijd en als je dan liefhebber bent van een oudere visie ben je ouderwets.
    Jouw visie vind ik niet verkeerd, maar mijn visie is anders. Ik ben wat meer van de oude stempel.
    Neem bijvoorbeeld de foto's van Oradour die ik in het forum heb getoond. Ik heb ze heel bewust nabewerkt zoals je ze hebt gezien. Dat was en is mijn visie. Jij kijkt er anders tegenaan. Dat is ook jouw goed recht. Toen ik daar was, voelde ik een bepaalde sfeer. Ik voelde ook de ontzetting van de gruwel die daar heeft plaatsgevonden.
    Jij hebt dat anders beleefd, heel nuchter en als een toeristische attactie.
    Voor mij was het dat niet.
    Zulke gevoelens en indrukken spelen mee in het maken van een foto en dat is voor elke fotograaf anders. Die verschillen mogen er zijn.

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  2. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Sunday 29 June 2025 at 21:42  | reply

    De boodschap van het artikel is duidelijk verwoord in de laatste alinea.

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  3. ifiamminghi
    Profile ifiamminghi wrote on Tuesday 1 July 2025 at 11:47  | reply

    Mooie opbouw van dit artikel, voor velen zal dit verrijkend zijn denk ik (al weten we allemaal dat het voor elke fotograaf en/of kijker anders kan zijn).
    Maar het achterliggend idee vind ik alvast verrijkend.

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  4. MARCEL Govaerts
    MARCEL Govaerts wrote on Tuesday 1 July 2025 at 12:39  | reply

    Ik dank je voor deze uiteenzetting gezien de aandacht van de lezer gevestigd wordt op het belang van de lenskeuze met betrekking tot de compositie die de fotograaf nastreeft.

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it