Nando Harmsen

A vertical or horizontal landscape photo - part 1

Saturday 10 October 2026, 14:41 by | 900 views | 6 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

A landscape or portrait photo? Should you hold the camera horizontally, or is vertical better? The choice is determined by the subject, but also by what you want to say with the photo. It is also very much a personal choice.

Do you choose a portrait photo? Or is a landscape photo better? Never follow so-called rules or self-imposed rules. Look at the subject and what you want to say with the photo.

A landscape photo is usually taken as a landscape photo. That is why it is also called landscape orientation. Feel free to deviate from this if the subject calls for it. But do think about it.

A portrait orientation, in other words a vertical photo, gives you plenty of space to show the foreground through to the background. It can also emphasise height, such as with a path between trees.

Road framed by trees - f/8, 1/100s, 1600 ISO @ 27mm

Road framed by trees - f/8, 1/100s, 1600 ISO @ 27mm


Even so, a vertical orientation is not always the best choice. Especially not with that path between the trees. You can see the height, but it says nothing about the forest the path runs through.

Choose a landscape orientation, a horizontal photo? Then you emphasise much better how the path runs through a forest. Try it out by taking a photo in both orientations.

Path through a forest - f/8, 1/100s, 1600 ISO @ 18mm

Path through a forest - f/8, 1/100s, 1600 ISO @ 18mm



It is not a matter of right or wrong. It shows a path through a forest in a different way. The caption with both photos shows what I want to say with the photo.

Choose what you like best. Do not choose it because you think tall trees require a vertical orientation.

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Nando Harmsen

About the author

Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.

Show every article in Landscape photography

6 comments

  1. Donald Willemsen
    Donald Willemsen wrote on Saturday 10 October 2026 at 20:45  | reply

    I photograph with a crop-sensor camera and I have a 10-18mm wide-angle zoom. With it I can show a great deal of the landscape, but the image is displayed enormously reduced, with quite a loss of detail. If I make a vertical panorama with a short telephoto lens, I get to see more detail, but the image also gets 'squashed together'. This in turn means that some of the depth in the landscape is lost. I struggle with that quite a bit. I still haven't figured out how to find the golden mean in that. I now want to experiment with my newly purchased 100mm tilt/shift lens. I know the principle of taking 3 photos horizontally with this t/s lens, but I would like to receive some more tips.

    Translated from Dutch.
  2. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 13 October 2026 at 13:16  | reply

    This has already been discussed many times.
    Have another read through this article. Then you'll see that there is no 'stitched-together' image, that what you're doing is nothing more than generating a high resolution (which you will in fact never need)
    https://photofacts.nl/landschapsfotografie/het-verschil-tussen-een-groothoekfoto-en-een-panorama-met-teleobjectief

    Translated from Dutch.
  3. Govaerts
    Govaerts wrote on Tuesday 13 October 2026 at 14:15  | reply

    This week here in Salinopólis (Brazil) I am going to take a photo, horizontally at low tide (at 7.00 a.m.) on the beach with a view of the ocean, placing the emphasis on the foreground and the patterns in the beach sand resulting from the receding water level. I have decided to opt for a 50mm lens and not for the "expanse" that a wide-angle lens provides, nor for the telephoto lens, to avoid compressing the foreground and background towards each other. I am curious....

    Translated from Dutch.
  4. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 13 October 2026 at 14:20  | reply

    Nice! Good luck.
    A small piece of advice, choose the right height to give the drawings in the sand enough space in the frame.
    But of course you already knew that. vrolijk
    I’m curious about the result

    Translated from Dutch.
  5. Liesbeth Verkade
    Liesbeth Verkade wrote on Tuesday 13 October 2026 at 17:43  | reply

    I caught myself choosing a portrait-oriented photo very easily. Over the past 2 weeks in France, I very consciously also took lots of landscape-oriented photos of the same subject/the same place. A few more days on the road. Once I'm home, I'll take a leisurely look at which photos are the best for me.

    Translated from Dutch.
  6. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Wednesday 14 October 2026 at 09:20  | reply

    That is a good way to gain insight.
    Sometimes portrait works, sometimes landscape is better.

    Translated from Dutch.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Become a better photographer every week

A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
38,938 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via Facebook. Sign-up secured with Google reCaptcha.

Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it