
7 ways to make money as a photographer in 2021
Sunday 14 February 2021, 23:32 by Elja Trum | 6,250 views | 9 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
Making money as a photographer is becoming increasingly difficult, especially with all the coronavirus restrictions. In this video, photographer Zdenka Daulra gives 7 tips for making money as a photographer in 2021.
Her tips are not ways to make money quickly. You simply have to work hard for it, but they might be ways to earn a bit extra in difficult times.
Her tips in brief:
1. Stock photography
2. Virtual tours (for homes)
3. 360 virtual tours
4. Drone photography
5. Product photography
6. Selling prints
7. Portraits for social media
What would your tip be for making money with photography?

About the author
Elja Trum is the founder of Photofacts and online photography course website Photofacts Academy. He has been writing about photography since 2006. Elja is also the author of (Dutch) books on composition, black-and-white photography, flash photography and portrait photography.
You might also like
-
Make money with stock photography (video)by Elja Trum
-
How do you invoice for your photography services?by Wilmar Dik
-
Which camera should you choose if money is no objectby Nando Harmsen
-
7 tips for property photographyby Elja Trum
-
7 Tips for Landscape Photographyby Elja Trum
9 comments
-

-
Stefanie wrote on Tuesday 16 February 2021 at 14:27 | replyThere really isn't any money in selling stock photography and prints through, for example, werk-aan-de-muur, the supply is so large that you really have to stand out a lot if you want to earn more than a bit of pocket money from it. For the options homes, portraits, product you also first have to find an opening, and drone photography is once again in a completely different field, especially when you consider that permits and certificates are needed if you want to fly even a somewhat decent drone (I haven't even mentioned being able to) Maybe parties weddings and first communions are still the best way, with a simple flyer on a noticeboard or through the letterbox at a party venue you can already get somewhere, but yeah, is that really what you want (not me, honestly)
Translated from Dutch. -
chris wrote on Tuesday 16 February 2021 at 15:21 | replyStock photography, Shutterstock scoured the internet and picked and stole all the free photos at the beginning without asking anything about who made this or the rights, and whose photo it was .. Disgusting practices, they also targeted my freely exhibited photos and put a price on them, without me having given permission for this - (just start proceedings, then you will be a lot of money out) disgraceful practices, money grabbers who make money at the expense of your artwork and then you can go and buy your own portraits back, surely ? no thank you warning to all photographers put a big copyright sign over your photo otherwise shutterstok shutterstock will steal all your photos and sell them this is a bunch of fraudsters
Translated from Dutch. -

Tromp Willem van Urk
wrote on Tuesday 16 February 2021 at 18:24
| reply
It's a shame that the reactions here are so negative about stock photography. It still provides me with a pretty decent side income!
Translated from Dutch.
On Photofacts, I have also written a number of articles about it. I also previously posted a comment on Wilmar's blog in Stock photography, still interesting?. With stock photography, the business model is simply fundamentally different from, for example, making 'standard' reportages.
I have also written a 'Stock Photography Handbook'. You can download it from my own website. Among other things, it also contains a separate chapter about the question of when you should or should not start with stock photography (nowadays). -
Chris wrote on Wednesday 17 February 2021 at 09:49 | replyI don't know the other platforms very well but one thing I do know for sure , that I am now protecting my photos against these thieves and money grabbers If you join this , this is of course your business and presumably you get a handout for your own work ,that they are still reselling my stolen works and making money from them yes as You write terribly sad and unfortunate that there is no honest platform where real art is appreciated where your artworks are not stolen and resold by fraudulent scammers,who misuse Your and my artworks for their own gain .So I don't need a book , rather an honest platform where one can and may exhibit his or her artwork in a correct honest way , without others making a profit from it .
Translated from Dutch. -

Wilmar
wrote on Wednesday 17 February 2021 at 10:39
| reply
20 stock agencies compared: https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2021/01/31/january-2021-brutally-honest-earnings-report-nice/ This photographer answers the question:"Is Microstock still worth it in 2021?" Including:
Translated from Dutch.
"I can categorically say no, it’s not worth it unless those consider it some sort of hobby. ...There’s more money to be made picking up loose change in supermarket shopping carts or turning cans/bottles over to recycling centres for a few quarters." -

BlueCourt wrote on Wednesday 17 February 2021 at 10:46
| reply
Good morning,
Translated from Dutch.
I’m just reading all the comments about selling to stock photography companies. But I also hear the suggestions to do it yourself through your own stock photography agency, where the photographers receive a fair price for their photo.
There are an amazing number of good photographers in the Netherlands!! So why not start a Dutch stock photography agency, only for Dutch photographers!!!!
Can we, all together, still put Dutch photographers on the map..... -

Tromp Willem van Urk
wrote on Thursday 18 February 2021 at 19:41
| reply
@Wilmar: what is stated in the article you referred to I had already argued myself in the blog mentioned above! It’s just that the lens through which you want to interpret the facts is different. If you expect an immediate return from stock photography, you should never start doing it. If you do it as a hobby, then your time is ‘free’. And that way you can get a lot of pleasure from stock photography, with the extra income as a bonus. Nice in any case, that I’ve been able to upgrade my entire photo gear with it over the past year 😊.
Translated from Dutch.
But nobody is forcing you to take up stock photography, are they? So why the bitterness here about dismissing it!?
@Chris: The royalties for photographers are indeed lower than they were about five years ago. But in the 12 years I’ve been doing stock photography, I’ve never experienced a ‘theft’ like the one you describe.
@BlueCourt. It’s already there, the “National Image Bank”! -

Wilmar
wrote on Friday 19 February 2021 at 09:56
| reply
Dear Tromp Willem,
Translated from Dutch.
This blog is about making money as a photographer. For a (professional) photographer, it is very important to focus on things that actually generate money. Stock photography is not one of them, if you look even just a little at the hours you have to put into it. That is why I think it is important to properly inform photographers about what the actual income from stock photography is. If you see it 100% as a hobby, and have a good steady job outside photography, then it does not matter. But if you have even the slightest intention of actually making money with photography, then I think it is useful to be well informed. The fact that an agency like Shutterstock prohibits its photographers from sharing sales figures actually says enough already.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,083 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum


