
Create fake travel photos using a television
Wednesday 8 March 2023, 13:31 by Elja Trum | 3,982 views | 10 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
Most people know not to put too much trust in the authenticity of photos on social media. Photographers Manuel Bechter and Manuel Rom demonstrated this on their TikTok channel with stunning travel photos

They made those travel photos using a television. A creative and well-executed way to take unusual photos from your living room.
@manuel_bechter Hiking on a budget 🏔️ Photo Idea at home 📸 #photoinspo #photographytricks #photography #tiktokart ♬ original sound - manuel_bechter
Using a television this way is probably even easier for many people than replacing a background in Photoshop. It is also a good way to make the light from the scene fall on your model as well.
@manuel_bechter Camping on a budget 🏕️ Photo Idea at home 📸 #portraitphotography #photoshoot #creativephotography #manuelbechter ♬ original sound - manuel_bechter
The photographers used a Sony A7 mark 4 fitted with an 85mm f/1.4 lens. Of course, you can do this with any camera and lens, although a little telephoto lens is useful to keep the edges of the television out of the frame.
@manuel_bechter Flying on a budget ✈️ Airplane Window View Photo Trick 📸 #photography #creativephotography #photoidea #fyp #manuelbechter ♬ original sound - manuel_bechter
You can find many more creative practical effects for taking unusual photos on their channels.
Via: Petapixel

About the author
Elja Trum is the founder of Photofacts and online photography course website Photofacts Academy. He has been writing about photography since 2006. Elja is also the author of (Dutch) books on composition, black-and-white photography, flash photography and portrait photography.
You might also like
-
Tip: How to Make Social Media Photos Stand Out More?by Huub Keulers
-
The best photo sizes for social mediaby Nando Harmsen
-
5 tips to turn your holiday photos into great travel photosby Nando Harmsen
-
Creative photography of everyday things by Helga Stentzelby Nando Harmsen
-
5 tips for better travel photographyby Elja Trum
-
Smartphone photography and travelby Nando Harmsen
10 comments
-
Donald Willemsen wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 11:47 | replyTaking photos this way really goes too far for me. I call this deceiving e viewer. Moreover, you use images made by others that may be protected by copyright.
Translated from Dutch. -

-
Lauran wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 12:23 | replySorry, but in my sincere opinion that is no longer photography.
Translated from Dutch. -

-
Lauran wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 13:16 | replyYes, it's fine, Elja. You just have to prove you're right, don't you. Then don't publish anything anymore and just go make your pictures.
Translated from Dutch. -

Elja Trum
wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 13:37
| reply
It’s not clear to me why you’re reacting this way now. In my opinion, using a television this way is no different from replacing a background in Photoshop. And I actually think this is a more creative solution.
Translated from Dutch.
You’re perfectly entitled to think that you no longer consider it photography. I was wondering where you draw the line then. -
Stefanie wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 14:03 | replyOf course it is and remains fake, but I do see the challenge in doing it in such a way that it doesn't look fake. The same goes for replacing skies and even for fantasy compositing. As long as the basis is your own photographic material, I still consider it to fall under photography, no one has ever claimed that a photo must always perfectly represent the truth ...
Translated from Dutch. -
Donald Willemsen wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 14:14 | reply@Elja, you can expect such a final comment from Lauran. That's simply stirring things up. Don't take it personally.
Translated from Dutch.
There is nothing wrong with replacing backgrounds if you initially do that with your own material. If you use someone else's material, it seems decent to me to ask for and have permission for it. -
remco wrote on Tuesday 14 March 2023 at 15:21 | replyWhen you take a photo in a studio where you want to tell some kind of story, you also get all kinds of props out of the cupboard. The fact that the background is digital now, instead of a roll-up background, is simply smart use of the 'materials'.
Translated from Dutch.
Nowadays you have countless royalty-free photographic materials, and various quality sites where photographers make material available for free, even for commercial use). Copyright is a thing, of course, but you don't have to assume that these kinds of photos were obtained improperly... -

Donald Willemsen
wrote on Wednesday 15 March 2023 at 08:59
| reply
@Remco, you're right about that royalty-free material, but as a viewer of photos composed in this way, you don't. When you use royalty-free material and the photographer's name is known, I would consider it decent to mention that name in some way alongside the image you made. That also makes it clear that you used material originating from others.
Translated from Dutch.
Everyone decides for themselves what they do, of course, but that's how I see it now.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,078 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum


