Nando Harmsen

Sensible or silly? A camera for your hobby and holidays

Monday 19 February 2024, 20:02 by | 4,693 views | 46 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

Is photography your hobby? Then you probably have a good camera with a matching set of lenses. Perhaps you own flashes and other useful accessories too. You use them to practise photography. Do you take that camera with you on holiday? Or would it be better to use a different camera?

Suppose you photograph portraits. You do that on location with a flash, an umbrella or softbox, mounted securely on a light stand with a sandbag. You have a beautiful full-frame camera with an 85mm f/1.8 for lovely background blur. Photographing with it is always a joy.

Nando strobist on location

Camera, lens, flashes, softbox. It is quite a lot to carry, but fun to use.

Or perhaps you are working with macro, using a crop-sensor camera with a good macro lens. You have special flashes for it and a sturdy tripod. You create the most beautiful images with it.

Maybe you are the landscape photographer who enjoys a beautiful sunrise. You capture it with your camera and an ultra-wide-angle lens. You have filters and a sturdy tripod to keep everything stable.

Nando long exposures on the coast

Tripod, filters, camera, lenses. Photographing by the sea and capturing beautiful landscapes is wonderfully timeless. You do not do that on holiday, or do you?

And then the time comes to go on holiday. Do you take the camera you use for portraits, macro or landscapes with you? Or would you rather not? After all, you are going on holiday, not on a photography trip.

Nando all equipment for use

You probably will not use all that equipment for your photography hobby on holiday. Perhaps another camera is worth considering?

Is it sensible to leave your photography hobby camera, and all the equipment that normally goes into the camera bag, at home? Or do you take it all with you? The alternative is a smartphone for your holiday photos, but that hurts as a photographer. You want something better than a smartphone photo.

Nando small camera

A small APS-C camera from Canon. Small, lightweight, and still offering plenty of possibilities. Perfect for holidays.

Is it sensible to buy a separate camera especially for holidays and day trips? This gives you the option of choosing a compact camera that is easy to take with you, while still delivering good results.

Nando a small bag and small camera

Forget that large backpack. Take a small bag on holiday. It does need to hold a small camera, of course.

Consider the small cameras from Panasonic or OM-Systems (formerly Olympus), with their compact lenses thanks to the small M43 sensor. They take up hardly any space. Or perhaps a good compact camera with an APS-C sensor is an option, such as a Sony A 6700 camera or a Fujifilm X-T20.

Nando compact camera and a beer

A holiday is for enjoying yourself. Good photos let you enjoy it all over again in the years that follow. A camera for holidays is not such a crazy idea. Or is it silly?

You could even choose a good compact camera with a built-in zoom lens. Something that is not too heavy and easy to take with you. That way, you can still take beautiful, high-quality photos without having to carry all the equipment you normally use.

Is this a good idea, or is it silly? Or should you simply leave everything at home and take a few snapshots with your smartphone? What do you think as a hobby photographer, or if you work professionally? Is a separate camera for holidays a good idea?

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Nando Harmsen

About the author

Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.

Show every article in Personal

46 comments

  1. Gina Heynze
    Gina Heynze wrote on Monday 19 February 2024 at 21:14  | reply

    GSM is indeed not an option. I have the Sony RX10 IV. A little magic box and great for taking on vacation as long as you don't have to photograph indoors. Because of the small sensor, you're limited in ISO. But other than that.....Great!!!

    Translated from Dutch.
  2. Donald Willemsen
    Profile Donald Willemsen wrote on Monday 19 February 2024 at 23:05  | reply

    My Canon R7 always comes along on holiday. I put an 18-150mm kit lens on the camera and take the 10-18mm with me. in the backpack. I also pack the Haida filter set and monopod in the backpack, along with personal medical supplies and some clothing. That is my hand luggage for a flight.
    If I go on holiday by car, I actually take all my cameras and lenses, monopod, tripod and reportage flashes with me. I do leave the studio flashes at home. My camera case then contains the camera and almost all the lenses. The monopod and tripod each have their own case.
    My wife takes her own camera with zoom lens in a shoulder bag. She can also use my EF lenses if necessary.
    I categorically refuse to take photos with my smartphone. I use my smartphone for all sorts of things, except taking photos.

    Translated from Dutch.
  3. Hans van Sterkenburg
    Hans van Sterkenburg wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 12:27  | reply

    Hi Nando. It can get even crazier; after many, many years sold everything to do with Canon and switched to the 6700. Enjoying it.

    Translated from Dutch.
  4. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:16  | reply

    Why is that crazier? There's nothing wrong with it, right?

    Translated from Dutch.
  5. Bernard Veerman
    Bernard Veerman wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:05  | reply

    Well, a classic problem, I would say. Do you go to a place you visit more often, or do you go to a once-in-your-life-time place. Of course, it's not a matter of black or white and a middle ground might be a possible solution? Questions like: What quality do you demand of your photos? Do you consider holiday photos important? What are you going to do with your photos at home? Do you want to be able to handle all situations, or are you willing to make compromises? Are you going out with a bag/suitcase, or are you keeping it simple? All questions that can produce a different answer for each person. This is how I do it myself: 1) I don't want inferior quality photos, 2) I take my EOS 5Dmk4 (full frame) with the 24-105mm "L" series and accept that I can't take super wide-angle and super telephoto photos. In practice, this has shown that I miss about 5% because of that, and I can live with that, 3) to avoid carrying a ton, I simply leave the rest at home. I do make sure to bring a few extra 64GB cards because I photograph in RAW format, weight-wise it makes no difference. You never know... I once had a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1, a 4/3 camera with a 14-140mm and I regret ever getting rid of it. If you ask me about an ideal holiday camera, that was it.

    Translated from Dutch.
  6. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:21  | reply

    Indeed, the question is what kind of images you want to have. Although the smaller, more compact cameras certainly do not deliver inferior quality either. You make compromises sooner with your choice of lens.
    The question of whether holiday photos are important can only have one answer: more important than the photos for your hobby. Holiday photos are memories and therefore have more value. Maybe not now, but certainly in the longer term. Quality is then even secondary.
    Fortunately, the quality does not have to suffer.
    Thanks for sharing, Bernard.

    Translated from Dutch.
  7. Raphaël De Vos
    Raphaël De Vos wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:20  | reply

    Making a beautiful trip usually coincides with the most beautiful moments - including wonderful views and spectacular sights, unique strange faces and a scene full of situations - that you will experience that year. A shame to leave your most high-performance and best equipment at home at those moments. Indeed, it takes some courage and effort to drag along all that stuff (although?). As a photographer, do not let yourself be tempted by the great multitude that no longer wants to carry more than “a flat thing with a stamp-sized window” called a smartphone. You are a photographer to put something in the picture that is better than average. If not, you are not worthy of that title. In addition, as a good photographer, you do not only spend time making your photos during the trip, but the main work, which you enjoy doing, still takes place afterwards at home. Here too, away with the annoying comment: I want to spend as little time as possible on that afterwards, or even, on the very day you took the photos: you can send them to me tomorrow. Remember this: if you want to take good photos, this will in any case require time, a lot of time, an enormous amount of patience, and unfortunately as much knowledge of photo editing as possible. Above all, let there be no misunderstanding: Do not trust AI too much, especially not currently. It is far too inaccurate, and remember that your brain is more capable than any form of AI. My conclusion: Are you a real photographer, then you take as much photographic equipment with you as possible, with pleasure and without any feeling of obligation.

    Raphaël De Vos

    Translated from Dutch.
  8. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:27  | reply

    There is also a middle ground, Raphaël. You can also go small and compact without compromising on quality.
    Of course, no one is stopping you from taking everything with you. It's very good if you don't let anyone dictate that to you.

    But it does make me wonder: is it necessary to always take everything with you. More equipment doesn't mean better photos. Even with a small compact camera and a single lens, a good photographer can take insanely good photos.

    Translated from Dutch.
  9. Raphaël De Vos
    Raphaël De Vos wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:37  | reply

    To Bernard Veerman
    That's what I like to hear. I also work with a Canon 5D MKIII and MK IV. What I would do in your place: obviously no supertelephoto, unless you're going on safari, but I do find a wide-angle essential, especially if you're going to visit cities or something. In quite a few cases, with a 24/105 mm you'll find yourself embarrassed that you can't get the beautiful building in the picture. And on top of that, a 16mm/35 mm lens doesn't really require an immense amount of space. But indeed it's something else that gets added again vrolijk

    Translated from Dutch.
  10. Maurice
    Profile Maurice wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:43  | reply

    For my hobby, theater and dance photography, I have a Z7 and Z8 with nice lenses, on vacation I took the smallest one, the Z7, and a 24-200 vacation lens with me. A nice compromise between weight and quality.

    Translated from Dutch.
  11. Rob Smit
    Rob Smit wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 13:57  | reply

    Don't underestimate the current generation of (top) smartphones. Photos taken with, for example, the iPhone 15 Pro Max really don't fall short of many (including top) cameras. It is also possible to shoot in RAW. Naturally, it also depends on the type of holiday. You won't be lugging a 600mm lens around on a city trip, and on a safari you'd really look like a fool with your iPhone.

    Translated from Dutch.
  12. peterheins
    Profile peterheins wrote on Thursday 29 February 2024 at 12:42  | reply

    That's why professional photographers all photograph with a top smartphone. If it were the way you portray it, no one would be walking around with a DSLR or system camera anymore. These 2 latter cameras have a much larger sensor and more lens elements to correct all kinds of errors .And that's not for nothing. Fine for photos that you print in a small format and for Instagram, or if you have nothing else with you. But I was glad that I took my 2 full-frame DSLRs to Iceland after all. But if you're satisfied with it yourself, that's of course fine too, but that's different from saying that smartphones are just as good as traditional cameras. Werkaandemuur, for example, does not accept photos taken with a smartphone.

    Translated from Dutch.
  13. Joke
    Joke wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:22  | reply

    Since so far I have taken 2 tours with a group through a travel organization and there was little time in between to take photos, I used the iPhone. Otherwise I would get such a rushed feeling and that is not what I am on holiday for. It may differ depending on the organization.
    Not that a smartphone gives such a fantastic image, especially not for an enlargement, but good enough to show the atmosphere and the object or landscape for an album. You can also get a long way with Photoshop or another editing program. Also because you can shoot in RAW with an iPhone.
    There is also a course for this on the Academy and there are books about it for sale. It gave me the time to calmly take in nature, the atmosphere, the scents and the colours. We shared the photos in a group app anyway.
    Personally, I therefore think that the smartphone is too much maligned for working with it.
    I can imagine that this may differ per tour and group. Everyone should do what makes him or her happy.
    After this article, I am now considering a nice compact camera. My birthday is on the 23rd, so…….maybe a nice gift to keep in mind now.

    Translated from Dutch.
  14. ton van den bosch
    ton van den bosch wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:23  | reply

    Written for me. I could write exactly the same piece. I've had a small camera for vacations for two years, with which I shoot like a tourist, and extensive gear for extra things. Do you regret the choice?....... no, although sometimes when I see a beautiful building I do think "if only I had it now".........

    Translated from Dutch.
  15. Fritsflow
    Profile Fritsflow wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:34  | reply

    If possible, I leave my Nikon DSLRs (D750 & D810)at home. Too much lugging around because then you also want to bring a few lenses. Preferably, I only take my Leica Q3. Since you can't change lenses anyway, you become much more creative too.

    Translated from Dutch.
  16. Gert van Eck
    Gert van Eck wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:46  | reply

    Of course, like most people, I have a smartphone for occasional photography. In the article I read: "Think of the small cameras from Panasonic or OM-Systems (formerly Olympus), with the compact lenses thanks to the small M43 sensor." But I have been doing that all year already. Light body and lenses, also much less kg/mm. And I certainly don't find my Olympus camera small. Rather great in performance.

    Translated from Dutch.
  17. Charles Pisarowitz
    Charles Pisarowitz wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:46  | reply

    I photograph with an Eos 5Dmk4, on vacation I always take a compact camera with me. In recent years that has been the Sony RX10 IV with filters and tripod. Camera etc fits in a small bag. Can shoot beautiful photos, am very happy with the ease and result.

    Translated from Dutch.
  18. Bernard Veerman
    Bernard Veerman wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:47  | reply

    @Raphaël. Funny that you call it that. The 16-35mm is the lens that spends the most time on my camera. The reason I use the 24-105mm on holiday may well have to do with the nickname "reportage lens". In a very distant past, when we would dive into the darkroom in the evening after a reportage, I worked exclusively with a lens with that range on my Canon FT-QLs. The reason? During a reportage there is no time to change a lens and the motto is "aim and click" (and get it right in one go). This teaches you to make decisions quickly and pay attention to a great many things. I still have it now. If I take about 3 or 4 photos of a subject, then in 9 out of 10 cases it is the first shot that I use 😊

    Translated from Dutch.
  19. Stefanie
    Profile Stefanie wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:48  | reply

    Vacation and photography trip are the same thing to me, I'm not a beach lounger, so I bring a well-stocked camera backpack

    Translated from Dutch.
  20. Wim Langen
    Wim Langen wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:52  | reply

    When I go out, I always take my Panasonic Lumix S5M2 with me. I have a Lumix 24-105mm lens and a Lumix 70-200 mm telephoto lens, which I also use with a 2x teleconverter.

    The light intensity does decrease, but with the S5M2 you can go to a high ISO value with only very little loss of quality.

    Translated from Dutch.
  21. Eric Dankbaar
    Eric Dankbaar wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:55  | reply

    For portrait and technical photography, I use the Canon R6, which sometimes also comes along on location, but that depends on the subject I want to photograph.

    For the reports of walks that I post on my YouTube channel, I have been using the Canon G5X to my satisfaction for years. A handy compact camera that is an excellent alternative for this purpose. At the time, I bought this camera to avoid lugging around a large camera and lenses.

    Translated from Dutch.
  22. Nicolette Verdugt
    Nicolette Verdugt wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 14:58  | reply

    I have a Sony RX10M4 as a second camera, not only for holidays but also long walks.

    Translated from Dutch.
  23. Rob
    Rob wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 15:18  | reply

    Depending on the type of holiday, I take my Canon R5 with me or the compact Panasonic DC-TC200 (Lumix), sometimes even both knipoog. The TZ200 has a 1-inch image sensor, 20 million pixels, a Leica 24-360mm telephoto lens, image stabilizer and you can photograph in RAW. By now I have taken many beautiful pictures and made videos with it. Two large, high-quality photos of approx. 1 metre, taken with the TZ200, are hanging on the wall. Filming in 4K is simply excellent outdoors! Haha, while skiing it is of course not doable and especially very unwise to take an R5 with you. In short, the choice is quickly made, and that without too much loss of quality.

    Translated from Dutch.
  24. Hans van Sterkenburg
    Hans van Sterkenburg wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 15:28  | reply

    Nando, not just a camera for vacations, no, a camera for every day. So the vacation camera has replaced the work camera. And I like it very much. With a number of frequently used functions on easily accessible buttons. Whereas I used to walk in order to take photos, now I take photos because I walk, about 3500 km per year. Hence the weight matters. Whereas I used to take photos with the full-frame/24-105, now I use the APS-C and the 16-70. With more MP's, too. And the photos? Remarkable. Perhaps a telephoto lens will be added.

    Regards, Hans.

    Translated from Dutch.
  25. Bernie Benz
    Bernie Benz wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 15:38  | reply

    My wife and I have been taking active holidays for 30 years. I now take my Sony A7 IV with an 18 and 50 mm lens, and my wife, as a female birdwatcher, has the Sony SX 70 Hs with a 21-1365 mm zoom. Great for all the little birds.
    We do a lot of walking in the mountains or along rocky coasts, treks of up to 275 km in 2 weeks. And then you don't take an excessive amount of equipment with you. That's why I don't shy away from the iPhone either, it's fine for souvenir photos.
    At the beginning of this month we were in Finnish Lapland, just try photographing behind the Huskies, reindeer sleigh or on the snowmobile at - 30 degrees with a large camera.
    Yes, for the Northern Lights you do need a good, fast prime wide-angle lens and a tripod.
    Even while skiing you can actually only use a smartphone.

    Translated from Dutch.
  26. ton van den bosch
    ton van den bosch wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 15:40  | reply

    Funny, the comment from hans van Sterkenburg. You buy a small one because you don't want to lug around anymore. Maybe there should be a telephoto lens added after all. I bought a GX9 from Panasonic and a few lenses came with that too. Not heavy, but still more than you initially thought vrolijk

    Translated from Dutch.
  27. Liesbeth Verkade
    Profile Liesbeth Verkade wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 16:03  | reply

    Once started taking photographs with an Olympus Pen half-frame camera. A handy camera, because small . Fit in your pocket. Disadvantage: fully automatic. Got the taste for photography and received a Sony DSC-W7 for my birthday in 2005. I took beautiful photos with it during various holidays, but gradually I wanted more. More possibilities to adjust settings, interchangeable lenses for telephoto or wide angle. That is why I bought a Canon Eos 500D in 2010 with kit lens and 70-300 zoom lens. Never regretted it and lugged it along every holiday in a good backpack that could also hold provisions and extra clothing.
    I have now had an Eos 90D with an 18-135 mm lens for a few years, a 2x teleconverter and still my 70-300 lens. That goes along every holiday, in the same backpack or sometimes in a more compact small one when we go into the city. I am still glad that I have always done it this way. The photos I ink took with the Canon cameras are of very good quality (composition or exposure not always) and easy to edit in LR or PS. I have been able to make beautiful photo books thanks to the good quality of the images. I only use my phone to take a snapshot of the grandchildren or very occasionally of something when I don't have a camera with me. I wouldn't want to take any other camera on holiday than my Canon. I am very attached to RAW, because it can be edited well afterwards. Then I will just lug a little more. It is worth it to me.

    Translated from Dutch.
  28. Robert De Vos
    Robert De Vos wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 16:56  | reply

    What do I take with me?
    That depends on the planned trip.
    If I'm going on a photography trip, I take the whole shop with me. There can then be time made for a good photo/composition and you do need some equipment for that.
    If I'm going on holiday with my wife, I take my compact camera (nikon Z30 : gives better results for what the smartphone can't handle).
    That way my wife doesn't have to exercise too much patience when I'm striving for that perfect photo once again.
    If I'm going on a group trip, then it is practical to work with a good smartphone with a camera that still gives a good result.
    In a group you don't have much time/opportunity to engage in better photography, without holding up the group.
    With my smartphone I have still been able to take several beautiful photos, from which I then made a photo album.
    So no need to make a wall-sized enlargement.

    Sometimes, when on holiday, I do feel sorry for those photographers who have a whole shop hanging around their neck and don't get time from their wife to take a photo.
    They are already walking around sweating and look jealously at those people taking photos with their smartphone (often with the same reasonably good result!?)
    Not to mention the neck and shoulder pain that all that weight causes by the end of the day.

    The best camera the one you have at hand at the moment you get a beautiful shot in front of your lens.

    Translated from Dutch.
  29. PixelDude
    PixelDude wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 17:44  | reply

    A good holiday consists of having fun or resting, relaxing and recharging your batteries. When you go on holiday alone or with a group of photographers, I don't see any problem with dragging along all your photography gear and belongings. But you're not going to ruin a holiday with family or friends who show little or no interest in photography with all your photography stuff, are you? Selfish.
    Holiday photos are purely memory photos for me, where quality is secondary. Photos taken with a mobile phone are therefore perfect.
    Hopefully, after your trip, you won't bore friends or family by organising gatherings to show your travel photography. They will come, but not with any real enthusiasm ... pfff another evening where we get nothing out of it.
    Either you're a hobbyist and then you practise photography together with people who are interested, or you're a professional who takes a trip to earn a living from it.
    I ... only take photos with a mobile phone or a little trouser-pocket or waistcoat-pocket camera to capture nice memories that may ‘one day’ be retrieved electronically. Printing travel photos? No way.

    Translated from Dutch.
  30. martinphili
    Profile martinphili wrote on Tuesday 20 February 2024 at 18:57  | reply

    I agree with Pixel Dude. For years I took my family and camera on holiday to Ireland and that was never a success. I allowed myself too little time to make a decent shot because the family was waiting for Dad to finally finish taking photos so we could continue walking. Because of that haste, the photos weren't good enough and in the end I wasn't satisfied with them either.
    And then I decided to just leave my camera at home.
    I have to say: our holidays became much more fun!

    Translated from Dutch.
  31. Hans van Sterkenburg
    Hans van Sterkenburg wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 07:28  | reply

    Dear Ton, thanks for your response, and for your information: until recently my equipment consisted of 24 kilos. And now, therefore, of 2 kilos. Regards, Hans.

    Translated from Dutch.
  32. ton van den bosch
    ton van den bosch wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 10:15  | reply

    Hi Hans. Oops, then I'm still a small boy with my setup. I'm at around 12.5 kg. And I think my other camera is about 2 kg as well. So a breath of fresh air. vrolijk

    Translated from Dutch.
  33. Hans van Sterkenburg
    Hans van Sterkenburg wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 11:54  | reply

    Ton, a bonus: this did include the [licht]weight of the Fotok, a kind of handcart that I developed for this purpose. Folded up, it fit exactly around my backpack. Foto Konijnenberg brought it to the attention of interested parties. But yes, I sold my weight and Konijnenberg / Den Ham is also a thing of the past. Since this year, my website has been offline and the photo rental has been limited to a few friendly business relations. Regards, Hans.

    Translated from Dutch.
  34. ton van den bosch
    ton van den bosch wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 14:18  | reply

    Hans. By now, Konijnenberg has also joined the Kamera Express guild. So it is indeed from back in the day. vrolijk

    Translated from Dutch.
  35. Elja Trum
    Profile Elja Trum wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 16:19  | reply

    I believe Foto Konijnenberg now falls under CameraNu.nl. vrolijk

    Translated from Dutch.
  36. Elja Trum
    Profile Elja Trum wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 17:17  | reply

    Oh, I got it completely wrong. I had CameraTools.nl in my head.

    Translated from Dutch.
  37. Hans van Oers
    Hans van Oers wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 16:29  | reply

    nice subject Nando, on vacation you want to take portraits, landscapes , small subjects, capture cities , visit a museum or church, capture a candlelit dinner. in short you need all the disciplines of photography. The only thing is that I would like to keep the weight of my equipment limited. So besides my fast zoom I also have a travel zoom with a nice range of 24-240mm and also the Canon RF 100-400mm, nice and light in weight and also reasonably good macro. besides that a nice little wide-angle of 16mm a fixed 24mm 1.8 a a 50mm 1.8 which weighs nothing either. I can handle just about any situation with it with good results.

    Translated from Dutch.
  38. Donald Willemsen.
    Donald Willemsen. wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 16:30  | reply

    Foto Konijnenberg in Turnhout is in any case Kamera Express. As far as I know, all branches of Foto Konijnenberg have been taken over by KE.
    KE (originally a German company) has taken over several stores in the Netherlands and Belgium. It is noticeable that they have only taken over stores that already had a good reputation before the takeover.

    Translated from Dutch.
  39. Elja Trum
    Profile Elja Trum wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 17:05  | reply

    Ah, so apparently that's the difference. The Belgian versus the Dutch branch.
    Photo Konijnenberg in Apeldoorn was indeed taken over by CameraNu.nl.

    Translated from Dutch.
  40. Elja Trum
    Profile Elja Trum wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 17:18  | reply

    Oops..
    I’ve got it completely wrong. I had CameraTools.nl in mind.
    That one was taken over by CameraNu.nl.

    Translated from Dutch.
  41. Hans van Sterkenburg
    Hans van Sterkenburg wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 16:35  | reply

    Hi Elja, Kamera Express.

    Translated from Dutch.
  42. Donald Willemsen.
    Donald Willemsen. wrote on Wednesday 21 February 2024 at 17:37  | reply

    If I'm not mistaken, the main branch of Foto Konijnenberg was located in Hardenberg, Overijssel.

    Translated from Dutch.
  43. Ton van der Linden
    Ton van der Linden wrote on Thursday 22 February 2024 at 09:09  | reply

    An interesting dilemma, which I also ran into when taking our city trips in the (recent) past. I have been photographing with Olympus cameras for more than fifty years and followed them in their switch to MFT via FT and have no regrets about it. I have two OMD cameras for the "normal" photography work and a Pen EPL-5 for holidays and short trips. This camera is also always in the bag when we go babysit the grandchildren. The first time going out with the Pen camera took some getting used to, but now I do notice that with this device and 1 or 2 lenses you can still take the photos you would want to take.

    Translated from Dutch.
  44. Wil
    Wil wrote on Thursday 22 February 2024 at 11:55  | reply

    For me, this question is no longer an issue. I have 2.

    Initially, "born out of necessity" because of neck/shoulder complaints and the Canon 6D (later R6) with backpack, lenses etc becoming far too heavy for me. I still use it when I don't have to carry much or for long.
    In addition, I bought a Canon M5 with 18-150 and 11-22 at the time. The 2nd lens and extra battery go in a bum bag, no trouble at all anymore. 10% of the weight and volume, wonderful.
    Initially I certainly had my reservations about the quality of the latter, but once you accept the limitations ...

    Translated from Dutch.
  45. Philippe Demeyere
    Philippe Demeyere wrote on Friday 23 February 2024 at 08:09  | reply

    For my vacation I bought a Lumix Bridge fz200.
    A camera with a large zoom range, manual, preference for speed and aperture etc. Even if the settings are limited compared to my Canon 500. No more changing photo lenses during walks, for my wife it has really become relaxing. And I am very satisfied with my photo books

    Translated from Dutch.
  46. peterheins
    Profile peterheins wrote on Thursday 29 February 2024 at 11:32  | reply

    Well, Nando, judging by the reactions you certainly stirred things up. In the meantime I have a Canon 6D Mark II and a Canon 5D Mark IV, neither bought new.
    For holidays I use my Canon M5, usually with the 11-22mm for landscapes, but I have to say the 18-55mm and 15-45mm also take excellent photos. I even have a 120X80cm canvas hanging in the room on which you can even see the veins of the grapevines. So why a full frame?
    I use both full frames for portraits and sometimes weddings, with the latter you really do need 2 bodies.
    It is indeed a trade-off, on holiday I have no desire to walk around with heavy equipment, however when we went on a 10-day tour of Iceland last October, I did take my 2 full frames with me.
    That is then one of those ones in a lifetime trips.
    But actually, the quality of today's APS-C cameras is so good that APS-C is far from being obsolete.
    I also often see photographers with equipment costing 5-7 thousand euros (Canon R5 with RF 15-35mm, for example) and I think, why. Most photos are only shown on the web and then you can even manage with 8mp. And with such an expensive set you really won't take better photos if you don't "see it".
    So for me it is FF for my landscapes, portraits and weddings.
    And APS-C for my holidays, nice and light and compact and still excellent quality.

    Translated from Dutch.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Become a better photographer every week

A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,213 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via Facebook. Sign-up secured with Google reCaptcha.

Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it