
What do you think is most important in a camera?
Saturday 20 January 2024, 15:51 by Nando Harmsen | 3,438 views | 19 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
There are an enormous number of cameras on the market. And more are being added all the time. These are newer models, but that does not mean the old ones have become useless. So the choice is huge, very huge. What do you think is most important in a camera?
The possibilities of a camera are incredibly extensive. You can do so much with it that most photographers only use a small part of what it offers. Stacking, HDR, timelapse, video and super-resolution are just a few of the countless functions and possibilities.

It goes further than that. The number of buttons on the camera, the ability to adjust functions and the way information is displayed can all be customised. Autofocus plays a role, as does the number of images that can be taken.
What is the quality like? Dynamic range, rolling shutter, resolution and ISO performance partly determine what the image will look like. Is sensor size important? Or perhaps the brand matters to you?

You can already see that countless things can lead to choosing a particular camera. Or they may be things that led to the choice of the camera you have now. I once chose Canon because Nikon did not feel right in my hand. That was very personal. Now I choose Canon because I already have lenses and flashguns for it.
Suppose you had to choose now. Which choice would you make? Perhaps it is more important to ask the question differently. Which option or function is most important to you in a camera?
Is it dynamic range, ISO performance, sensor size, speed, autofocus, resolution or the brand? Or is it a specific menu option that is rare in the camera world? Is the size of the camera more important, the choice of lenses, the weight, the ergonomics, the option of personal settings or the appearance?
I am curious to know what you think is most important in a camera. And who knows, it might be a subject for us to write about. Let us know in a comment below this post.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
Nikon Zf gets new features with firmware upgradeby Elja Trum
-
Lightroom updates 2025, with more useful AI featuresby Nando Harmsen
-
New AI feature for Lightroom and Lightroom Classicby Nando Harmsen
-
The unique features of an Olympusby Nando Harmsen
19 comments
-

jeepee wrote on Sunday 21 January 2024 at 09:28
| reply
For me, color rendition is the most important thing, skin tones for example. I don't want to spend a lot of time on it in Lightroom. Ergonomics is also important, does the camera sit comfortably in *my* hand, not too big or too small, buttons in the right place for me (and buttons over having to dive into preferably clear menus). Are there ample lenses with character available (the latter nowadays with system cameras and adapters is not really a problem anymore to make suitable).
Translated from Dutch.
Less important is the number of megapixels, I used a 12 MP camera with great pleasure until quite recently, but full frame is preferable because of the shallow depth of field and the possibility of separating the subject from the background. Autofocus capability is also less important for my photography. I hardly use video, so I don't have many requirements here either. The number of shots per second is not important at all. -

-

martinphili wrote on Sunday 21 January 2024 at 10:53
| reply
Good question.
Translated from Dutch.
With my current camera, I very occasionally reach the limit of my ISO and every now and then I could use a slightly higher frame rate.
But regardless of which new camera you buy: all of that is perfectly fine with those things. So then you end up looking at things like ergonomics, menu structure and so on. And that is purely personal, of course.
That said: I’m always lugging around a 5D with a battery pack and heavy lens. Maybe I should take a look at a more compact and lighter little device that delivers the same quality (and has the same range in terms of lens) as my current workhorse. -

-
Rudy wrote on Sunday 21 January 2024 at 17:29 | replyI have 'too many' good cameras... Fuji Xpro 2, Olympus Pen F, Nikon P1000 etc..each with their own options in terms of possibilities, settings and lenses...I'm now considering trading in or exchanging everything... well, almost everything (I'll keep the P1000 for bird photography) to return to what made me happiest... a Leica full-frame rangefinder...with max. 2 lenses.. but a digital version...😉 back to the roots...
Translated from Dutch. -

-

kok.f@ziggo.nl wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 10:53
| reply
This is so subjective and dependent on personal preferences. Every brand and model has its pros and cons. But it takes more effort to find a bad camera (do they still exist?) than a good one. Very trite, but with every camera, that button at the top right is the most important. Whatever camera you have, you’ll always find some function with a particular brand/model that makes you think ‘I’d like to have that on my camera too’. I dare to counter that with: dare to be satisfied with what you do have. And for reassurance, good cameras exist, the best ones don’t.
Translated from Dutch. -
Hans van Oers wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 11:18 | replyFor me, the weight of the camera is important ; the new cameras are lighter but the fast lenses are often heavier
Translated from Dutch.
Canon therefore also has a choice of lightweight, high-quality prime lenses. the familiar menu structure in Canon is important to me, you can operate a brand-new camera almost automatically. the speed and determining the autofocus are of great importance, the photo succeeds or fails with the chosen focus. I could operate my 5d4 blindfolded, my R62 almost. Being able to continue using my old EF lenses is a nice bonus, the RF telephoto zooms are quite expensive. also dual card slots, and visible exposure control in the viewfinder -
Martin Hermes wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 12:14 | replyGood quality of the color rendition, at least 24MP
Translated from Dutch.
bluetooth and definitely GPS !! -
Meynckens Johan wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 12:29 | replyRecently I bought a D7 II from Nikon as an addition to the others.
Translated from Dutch.
I bought this camera because of minimal Noise, according to the advertisement.
I don't know How to remove the noise with this camera, it is not excessive, but it is Enormous...!
I use both my previous lenses and a Z lens.
Via LR the removal of noise is perfect but "not" from the camera.
Curious what kind of setting I should use on the camera. -

Nando
wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 14:31
| reply
I assume you mean the Z7 II instead of the Z7.
Translated from Dutch.
My advice: never blindly rely on claims in advertising. Read (or watch) reviews. Then you can see what it’s really like.
By the way, I can’t remember the noise being that bad with that camera. -

Leon wrote on Monday 11 March 2024 at 19:43
| reply
I prefer reading your reviews because of your experience rather than those of people I don't know or whose experience I don't know anything about or how much they have.
Translated from Dutch. -
Van Bloemendael Roderick wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 13:26 | replyI once started with Canon and you’re usually stuck with it after that. No problem, by the way. My camera has to be solid, full frame, and professional-grade. My current camera, the 1DX lll with L lenses, is great. Switching to mirrorless is almost not an option, the EF lenses no longer fit, (I don’t want to use converters) I’ll have to continue for a while yet with my 2 DX lll and beyond.
Translated from Dutch. -
Rudolf wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 13:46 | replyAbsolutely Bluetooth and GPS. Incomprehensible that GPS isn't standard in the camera. Don't come at me with a phone, I want it in the camera. Regards Rudolf
Translated from Dutch. -
Rob Dikkers wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 15:46 | replyI have been working with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II for 2 years now, not a modern camera but sufficient for me. Things I find important include an AF-ON button, GPS, many ISO options and an easy-to-read menu. Since I photographed with a 450D for a long time, the 7D Mark II is a nice camera that is also comfortable to hold.
Translated from Dutch. -
Ronald Maas wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 16:04 | replyMy considerations are as follows: after lugging around Nikon photo equipment for years to take macro shots in nature, I came across the Fuji FinePix 5000. It takes macro shots with considerable depth of field handheld in the field. (I didn't have to try that with bellows and a Nikon camera). The colours were also immediately to my liking. I am not a pixel freak, 6 Mp is sufficient for a computer screen. How can you display a 40 Mb shot in its entirety on your monitor? Most photographers are not professionals and view their results on a PC monitor that is 8 Mp?
Translated from Dutch.
And with these cameras, weight is no longer an issue. I am a satisfied Fuji user because of the colours. And I now use the 5000, 5500, 5600, the Hs30 EXR, the 9800 for macro shots, and my street camera, the X30. -

martinphili wrote on Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 19:26
| reply
And that's exactly what I don't want. With that battery pack the camera is beautifully balanced. Without that thing it tilts forward. Obviously tried that ages ago
Translated from Dutch.
-
Arjan Spaander wrote on Wednesday 24 January 2024 at 09:00 | replyMy first SLR was a Petri, fully manual, because it was affordable for me (over 40 years ago) with a K-mount as the lens mount. The next camera became a Pentax P50. Which I could use my already purchased lenses on. After more than 20 years of faithful service I switched to a digital camera. And you can probably guess: another Pentax so I could still use my 'old lenses'. By now I have been using my Pentax K10D for over 15 years again, and regularly with my old lenses. A nice camera with a lot of ease of use. Now I am considering a new camera because of a higher ISO range. And yes it will undoubtedly be another Pentax.... Nice that Pentax has kept the same lens mount all these years.....
Translated from Dutch. -
Meynckens Johan wrote on Wednesday 24 January 2024 at 14:36 | replyI have an analog Hasselblad C/m500.
Translated from Dutch.
I wonder if I can just put a digital back on it?
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,218 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum




