Nando Harmsen

Paying Attention to Timelapse Photography

Monday 4 November 2024, 16:32 by | 2,428 views | 2 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

Timelapse photography seems simple. You set up the camera, set the interval and wait until it is finished. But it is rarely that simple. You need to stay with it for the best result. I discovered that once again during my photography masterclass in France.

The idea was perfect. During my photography masterclass in France, I planned to make several timelapses. That way, I would have plenty of time for my course participants.

Nando masterclass tarn 02

The view of Cordes-sur-Ciel. Perfect for a sunset, which is exactly what the participants here are going to photograph. (smartphone photo)

Unfortunately, it turned out not to be as easy as I had initially thought. Especially because many of these moments would be during sunrise and sunset, when the light conditions are constantly changing. These are the famous holy grail timelapses.

The idea behind a holy grail timelapse is to constantly correct the exposure manually. The camera must be set to manual exposure for this. But when I am teaching a masterclass, I cannot stay with the camera continuously. The participants are more important.

So I thought: I will use aperture priority. Then the camera can adjust the exposure itself as the light changes. If it gets darker, the shutter speed will automatically become slower.

Nando masterclass tarn 01

It is getting darker and darker, and even with aperture priority, exposure compensation is needed. You do have to be able to apply it, of course. (smartphone photo)

Although the theory behind it sounds good, it works less well in practice. For full control, manual exposure settings are best, with lots of adjustments in small steps. You need to stay with it and pay attention.

I did not have time for that, as I was there for the participants. My cameras were left on their own. I was busy explaining and assisting, and walked from one participant to another. Every now and then I went to check my cameras, only to discover that things were going wrong.

The shots became overexposed, or underexposed, meaning I had to apply exposure compensation. This made the steps for the holy grail too large. I had not paid enough attention to positioning a graduated ND filter, or the composition was not quite right after all.


The timelapses did work in principle, but they were not as good as they could have been. I had to make far too many corrections in Lightroom to bring out the darker areas. In short, it required an enormous amount of editing and correction afterwards.

In this case, it could not be avoided. I was busy with something else that had a higher priority. But it is an important lesson for anyone making timelapses. Make sure you stay with it. Pay attention when photographing a timelapse.

The better you do things while photographing, the less time you need for editing. It makes everything much easier, and ultimately gives you better results. Stay with it for the best result.

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Nando Harmsen

About the author

Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.

Show every article in Tips and tricks

2 comments

  1. guest wrote on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at 16:02  | reply

    Thanks for the reminder. With a regular timelapse (without adjustments in exposure) you still have some time to do something else. With a Holy Grail timelapse you'll indeed have to stay with it.
    Short other question: How many stops are there between 'day and night' for you with a Holy Grail timelapse'? In other words, what starting settings (Exposure and ISO) do you start with and what do you end with?

    Translated from Dutch.
  2. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at 16:27  | reply

    Even with aperture priority, you have to keep checking, I've noticed. Especially when the sun is (or was) in your frame.

    There is little to say about the number of stops between day and night. This depends on the circumstances.
    If you know that daylight is around 14-15 EV and night with lighting is somewhere around 2-5 EV, then the difference can be as much as 10 stops or more.

    Translated from Dutch.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Become a better photographer every week

A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,219 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via Facebook. Sign-up secured with Google reCaptcha.

Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it