
Why is a landscape photo disappointing?
Monday 1 July 2024, 20:10 by Nando Harmsen | 7,129 views | 37 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
You take a photo of that fantastic landscape in that enchanting light, but when you get home, it is disappointing. Does that ever happen to you? It happens to me, and there is often a simple reason why. It is not always down to your photography knowledge or experience.
Are you in beautiful surroundings, with a fantastic landscape and magical light in front of you? Then enjoy it. Make sure you do, and do not experience the moment only through the camera. However, do not forget to take that photo, so you can enjoy the moment again at home.

But then the photo is disappointing. It is not like you experienced it. Sometimes that is down to the composition and the choice you made. What did you include in the frame, and how? Even so, that is only part of a possible reason.

Remember that you experienced more at the location than the view. The temperature, the wind, the smell, the sounds. The squelching of your boots in the water. The rustling of an animal in the grass, or the call of a bird in the sky. The sound of waves breaking or, in the Netherlands, the roar of traffic on the nearby motorway.

All those impressions create the overall picture and together form the atmosphere of the moment. At home, when you see the photo on your computer screen, all you have left is the image. The impressions that went with it are no longer there, even though they are so important to the atmosphere of the moment.
It is no wonder that the photo can be disappointing at first. That is why it is important to leave your photos for a while. This breaks your emotional connection with the moment, allowing you to assess your photos objectively.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
What happens to our photos when we're no longer here?by Nando Harmsen
-
Nature photography tip: Look closer to home tooby Rob Dijkstra
-
Disappointment over multiple exposures in new Canon camerasby Nando Harmsen
-
5 Tips for Variety in the (Home) Studioby Elja Trum
-
The added value of a good foregroundby Nando Harmsen
37 comments
-
Donald Willemsen wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 10:31 | replyActually, a very good idea to let the photos sit for a while before getting to work on them to finish them. It is true that by then the emotions of the moment have subsided and you get a more neutral view of the result from the camera.
Translated from Dutch.
Now, it is the case that when I take photos during a trip abroad (the Fleming refers to this as 'taking photos'), I only look at and finish the photos after returning home. I don't have a laptop, so I don't take one with me either. After returning home, the emotions of the moment have already cooled down anyway.
Those emotions do come back, though, but only when I look at them after finishing them. Then I enjoy the moment all over again. -
Wilfried wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 10:41 | replyThe experience of the moment is linked to the photograph for the photographer. When seeing similar photos by others, there is recognition and also a reliving of such moments. This experience is part of the communication between the creator and the viewer. That undermines the argument 'everything has already been photographed'. Yes, but not by me. I want to experience that too and therefore be ready to enjoy photos by others more.
Translated from Dutch. -
Ineke Stofmeel wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 10:47 | replyAnother important reason is - I think - that we see three-dimensionally with our eyes. And that is not the case with a photo. And then, of course, an important part of the experience is lost.
Translated from Dutch. -
Hugo Overvliet wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 11:43 | replyWilfried writes :
Translated from Dutch.
... of such moments.
It is :
- of such a moment
or
- of such moments
Kind regards,
Hugo. -

Liesbeth Verkade wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 14:00
| reply
Hugo, there is a difference between Dutch and Flemish.
Translated from Dutch. -
hennie kuijer wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 11:48 | replyYes, recently I was driving to work in the early morning; mist over the land and everything breathed peace and space... and I thought; we can make a perfect photo now, but as you all already say here....you don't feel the wind then and you no longer smell the raindrops and the peace that passes through you at that very moment...and also yes; it's only two-dimensional...on a silly little piece of paper...or on a slapped-together screen; it remains tinkering, no matter how perfect such a photo may be...it remains shoddy work....think then, when you're driving through such a landscape and you're overcome by the feeling: 'how do I capture this'...this moment is now being given to me; this experience and then think of the Maker who did not hesitate to create this...
Translated from Dutch. -

-
hennie kuijer wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 13:15 | replyNo, that isn't it either and that's not what I mean either, but compared to what you put in the photo, yes....ultimately you want to copy something...something that was made, not by you...
Translated from Dutch. -

Nando
wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 13:20
| reply
You don't copy, you record what you see. You capture it: a one-to-one representation.
Translated from Dutch.
And that can be done in several ways, and that's called making choices in image construction and composition.
The only thing you don't capture is feeling, hearing, smell, and so on. That absence can make the photo disappointing... -
Donald Willemsen wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 13:39 | reply@hennie Kuijer, I understand very well what you're getting at, but leave your faith (a private matter) out of it, because that's not what this is about.
Translated from Dutch. -

Liesbeth Verkade wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 14:17
| reply
Funny, how different people are. I actually always get very happy looking back at my photos immediately after getting home because it instantly brings back the feeling of that moment, even if a photo isn't quite your thing. Maybe that's also the reason why I find it very hard to get rid of photos, unless they really turned out badly, i.e totally blurred or completely missed the subject. I notice anyway that photos are able to immediately transport me back to that moment. And then enjoy all those special things all over again.
Translated from Dutch. -
Viviane wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 14:42 | replyDear Nando, good explanation with a great many truths…leaving it for what it is, taking some distance, the absence of atmospheric sounds, evoked feelings… also the reaction 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional….
Translated from Dutch.
It immediately explains a lot about why you sometimes look back at your own images with mixed feelings….
I have once seen a presentation by you in which you had edited very serene, peaceful music to your own images. And even though I was not present at that moment when you took those photos and it therefore was not my personal input… and I therefore could not ‘experience’ the photos at all while capturing them… That music and the atmospheric developed photos nevertheless give an ‘own experience’ and an ‘idea’ of how you perceived this. In that way, you yourself create a personal atmosphere with someone else’s images.
A true art to create an atmosphere for others in that way. -

-
Tineke Schilperoort wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 14:45 | replyThere is something to be said for both. Both looking back immediately and also letting it rest for a while and then looking again.
Translated from Dutch.
I nowadays already select 'in the field' whether I put something in the photo or not. Often you already know in advance whether something you actually want to show can really be seen in a photo or not. Sometimes it is about a certain atmosphere or a difference in height/depth that is difficult to capture.
Looking back immediately often serves the function of selecting for me. Do I want to keep a photo or not and if not, why not. Looking back later brings the moment back and that almost always makes me very happy again. -
Bernie Benz wrote on Tuesday 2 July 2024 at 18:11 | replyDue to an accident, I have been missing an eye since I was six. Now, over sixty years later, I have forgotten what seeing three-dimensionally is. I think that helps when taking a photo, the photo is as I always see it.
Translated from Dutch.
During photographing, I do not let the sounds, how warm or cold it was, the weather etc. play a role. Only the light is important.
When I see the photos again later I remember the circumstances again. -

-
Stefanie wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 09:42 | replyI actually almost never select in the field, unless I’m running out of memory, which rarely happens. I’ve often had it happen that a photo that seemed to have failed in the field still had something I could use for something later, maybe not the moment I wanted to capture but something completely different. I’d rather look back at home and filter them out then, that way the atmosphere usually comes back too, and the failed photos are often nice memories as well
Translated from Dutch. -

-

-
Paul eos wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 10:30 | replyThe only solution to REALLY fully enjoy again what you experienced is "filming". It's a pity that filming gets so little attention here, although I understand it, it is simply difficult to break photographers' habits. That was the case with me too, until I tried it once anyway and now I'm completely hooked on filming.
Translated from Dutch. -

-
Donald Willemsen wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 10:47 | replyTotally agree Nando. On such a small screen everything looks sharp. The same goes for viewing published photos on a smartphone. That's why I view your photos and those of others on a large computer screen, because then you also see more details.
Translated from Dutch. -
Tineke Schilperoort wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 11:04 | replyThat is not what I do either. I decide on the spot whether or not I take a photo. I always review the photos I have taken on the computer.
Translated from Dutch. -
Gretha wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 11:52 | reply👍😄
Translated from Dutch. -
van loon antoon wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 12:52 | replyThat’s why I make digital series. That way I can give a series of images more value because the series lifts the individual images to a higher level. If you then add some suitable music and a spoken text, then it’s finished for me. It is and remains photography, of course, but with those additional elements you push the beauty upwards. I also leave my images, from which I want to make a digital series, lying around for a few weeks to months. They have already been edited and are in their final folders. When the digital series is ready in my head, it is processed on the PC.
Translated from Dutch.
This can all replace the local atmosphere well. And you still get the feeling that it isn’t just looking at images. There is something extra. If you want to preserve the real atmosphere, then you have to film. But photographers are generally somewhat selfish by nature. As long as my neighbour doesn’t see how I do it, that usually wins out. There is one disadvantage... I usually photograph horizontally and also take linking photos with a view to making... So local atmosphere is VERY important but can be taken over by the technique and the inspiration we have developed. -

-
Jan van Leeuwen wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 13:40 | replyThat's right. The quality of the photo is often good, but some of the magic is gone. I also always appreciate my photos more as they get older.
Translated from Dutch. -

martinphili wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 19:49
| reply
They usually disappoint me because I just don't have the knack for it.
Translated from Dutch. -

Nando
wrote on Thursday 4 July 2024 at 09:07
| reply
But if you enjoy yourself while and during the making of the images, it's perfect.
Translated from Dutch.
I hope you don't set the bar too high for yourself. I catch myself doing that sometimes too. Looking back later (much later) helps. At that point you are less emotionally involved and can assess the photo more objectively. -
van loon antoon wrote on Wednesday 3 July 2024 at 23:41 | replyIn the past, people made slide shows. That was of course with slides. Four projectors with dissolves. That was quite a hassle and also quite a move if you went somewhere else.
Translated from Dutch.
Now people make the same thing but call them digital slide shows or digital series. You take your laptop, a beamer and a Bluetooth speaker with you and that is all (there is usually a screen).
Every year in January you have a study day in Gilze-Rijen in the function room 'De Boodschap'. About 20 digital series are projected there.
In the past, they were in an .exe file. Now it has to be in Mp4.
Since I only have .exe files and I know that the PCs there may have difficulty with them, I will try making an Mp4 file from one of the series. But give me a little time. -

Nando
wrote on Thursday 4 July 2024 at 09:03
| reply
Ah yes, those dissolve projectors. I know of systems with two (I used to sell those dissolve systems), I don't know of any with four.
Translated from Dutch.
According to your description, I have also made digital sequences. I simply call them slideshows.
An example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wU8qfKRJJU -
Lauran wrote on Thursday 4 July 2024 at 07:47 | replyCan we agree on one comment per arikel? Before it gets bogged down in discussions. I feel that some people keep demanding far too much attention.
Translated from Dutch.
Regards Lauran -

-
Tineke Schilperoort wrote on Thursday 4 July 2024 at 09:15 | replyLauren, should we then draw lots for who gets to say something? You don't have to read everything either if you find it too much. I like reading how others think about something or how they do something. You can always learn something from it.
Translated from Dutch. -

Guido Bellens wrote on Thursday 4 July 2024 at 13:24
| reply
Hello Nando, the atmosphere you experience while photographing, smell, sound, temperature, you can't retrieve from a photo. I have also noticed that I would edit some old photos differently now. maybe it would be nice to have a raw image edited by different people, they weren't there when you took that photo, what would that result in?
Translated from Dutch. -
Jan van Leeuwen wrote on Friday 5 July 2024 at 19:06 | reply@martinphili, you could try a workshop with a landscape photographer. It’s about the right composition, beautiful lighting, etc. That helped me too.
Translated from Dutch. -
Lauran wrote on Saturday 6 July 2024 at 03:37 | reply@Tineke, no of course you don't have to draw lots. But there is no subject that so much is written about and relatively so little of is seen. But if you like to engage in the discussion, you should also be able to withstand criticism. And that is where the shoe pinches for me. People who can't do anything yet but like to try to write interestingly. Or go to gatherings sometime. The sycophancy drips from it. Joining in, yes, that is done a lot. You can also criticize without insulting the person in question or sometimes it is better to keep quiet. I notice that I increasingly choose the latter. People get angry so quickly. But I don't howl along with the wolves in the forest. Regards, Lauran.
Translated from Dutch.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,219 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum



