
The Most Expensive Lenses in the World
Monday 6 December 2021, 16:32 by Nando Harmsen | 10,624 views | 12 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
A high-quality lens is expensive. Three thousand euros is not unusual these days. Most hobby photographers can barely afford such amounts, if at all.
It can always be even more expensive, but then you have something truly unique. At least, if you can find one for sale.
Most of the lenses at the top of the quality range are expensive. Prices between 2,000 and 4,000 euros are not unusual. Then you have an ordinary lens, with no unusual focal length.

Would you like a super-telephoto lens with a large aperture? Then prices rise to more than ten thousand euros.
These are highly specialised lenses that not every photographer needs. Bird and wildlife photographers use them a lot, as do sports photographers.

Highly specialised lenses such as this Nikon AF-S 800mm f/5.6E VR ED FL cost no less than 20,450 euros. It is one of the most expensive normally available super-telephoto lenses.
Of course, it can always be even more extreme. There are lenses that are unaffordable. These are often extreme lenses that are made, or were made, in small numbers. Sometimes at the special request of a particular customer, sometimes to explore the limits. Simply to see what is possible.
I went searching and listed eight of the most expensive lenses.
1. Sigma 200-500mm f/2,8 APO EX DG
A well-known lens is the Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8. It is a modern lens with an LCD screen showing the focal length and focusing distance. You can get this lens in Nikon, Canon and Sigma mounts.

It weighs 15.7 kilograms and is only 72.6 centimetres long.
The price of this lens is around 32,000 dollars.
2. Canon 5200mm f/14 mirror lens
Canon developed a 5200mm lens especially for astrophotography. The lens weighs only 100 kilograms, and the minimum focusing distance is 120 metres.

It has a fixed aperture of f/14, but with the built-in ND filter system it is possible to go up to f/32. In the image above, the small attachment on the right is a camera. That gives you a good idea of its size.
A few years ago, one was put up for sale on eBay for 45,000 dollars. Nobody knows what it would fetch today.
3. Nikkor 1200-1700mm f/5.6-8.0s P ED IF
This is the zoom lens with the longest focal length in the world. The lens dates from 1990 and has a Nikon F-mount.
It is 88 centimetres long and 23.7 centimetres in diameter. It weighs no less than 16 kilograms. Your subject must not be closer than 10 metres, otherwise it cannot focus.

The price of this lens is somewhere between 60,000 and 75,000 dollars.
4. Zeiss Apo Sonnar T 1700mm f/4
This lens is the result of an attempt to make the best lens in the world. That was in 2006, and this lens is intended for the Hasselblad 6x6 camera. It weighs no less than 256 kilograms.

The price is estimated at more than 100,000 dollars.
5. Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM
This is perhaps the best-known extreme telephoto lens. The lens first appeared during the 1984 Olympic Games. It weighs no less than 16.5 kilograms, and the minimum focusing distance is 14 metres.

The lens occasionally appears on the market. Recently, a used example was for sale for no less than 120,000 dollars.
6. Nikkor 6mm f/2,8 Fisheye Lens
This is the most extreme wide-angle lens in the world. With an angle of view of 220 degrees, you can photograph as far as 'behind' the lens.

At 5.2 kilograms, it is not a light lens. Its diameter is no less than 23.6 cm. It was built in 1970 for scientific and industrial purposes.
The price of this lens is somewhere around 160,000 dollars.
7. Leica APO-Telit-R 1600mm f/5,6
This lens was specially developed and built for Sheikh Saud Bin Mohammed Al-Thani from Qatar. As far as is known, this is the only existing example of this 1.2-metre-long lens.

Its diameter is no less than 42 centimetres and it weighs 60 kilograms. The sheikh had a Mercedes converted so that he could drive around and take photographs with this lens.
The amount the sheikh spent on this lens is no secret. It was exactly 2 million dollars.
8. Carl Zeiss 50mm Planar f/0,7
This lens has the largest aperture in the history of photography. It was developed for NASA's Apollo programme, so that photographs could be taken on the dark side of the Moon. The lens was made in 1960 and no more than 10 examples exist.

Standley Kubrick used this lens for the film Barry Lyndon so that he could film by the light of a single candle.
The value of this lens is estimated at a minimum of 23 million dollars. That makes it the most expensive lens in existence.
Lenses for ordinary mortals
Of course, the lenses mentioned above are not for ordinary mortals. They are not lenses you would normally use either. These are showpieces with very little practical use.
Although the prices of these lenses reach extreme heights, ordinary lenses in the best possible quality are still very expensive.
Fortunately, affordable lenses are also available for us to work with. And rest assured, you can take excellent photographs with those too.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
World Press Photo winners announcedby Nando Harmsen
-
AI is taking over the world and photo editingby Dick Holtman
-
Be sensible, buy a good tripodby Nando Harmsen
-
Turn the World Upside Downby Nando Harmsen
-
Golden Moment wins the World Sports Photography Awardby Nando Harmsen
-
Nature photography tip: Discover a new world after sunsetby Rob Dijkstra
12 comments
-
Lauran wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 10:52 | replyYou'd better rewrite the piece about Kubrick because he made his own lenses for many films.
Translated from Dutch.
Furthermore, it's different for everyone which lenses they photograph with. For the pro, the more expensive lenses are a must. An amateur can't earn these back and therefore it's pointless to even look at them. -

PixelDude Raoul
wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 11:36
| reply
With a crop, e.g. crop 2, everything is
Translated from Dutch.
- much cheaper
- much lighter
and with the new sensor technologies there is actually no significant difference compared to a FF.
I have, with crop 2 and very affordable lenses, a 40-150 F2.8 and a 1.4 converter, a FF equivalent of 420 mm F4.0. Just compare this weight and price for an F 4.0 with a FF solution. -

Peter van Dinther
wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 11:54
| reply
Hi Nando
Translated from Dutch.
Thanks for the article, nice to read but actually it's not much use to you. Just as much as admiring sports cars costing several tons or more. But anyway it's nice to keep dreaming… -
wim wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 12:15 | replyso save up a little longer then!
Translated from Dutch. -

PixelDude Raoul
wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 12:58
| reply
Some figures for my crop 2-lens solution FF equivalent 420 mm F4.0.
Translated from Dutch.
Weight of the combination : 0.887 kg
Total length : 18.5 cm
Total cost (official) : 1249 + 349 = 1598 €
More and more nature and bird photographers (perhaps by now already the majority) are choosing a crop solution. Maybe not so much because of the cheaper price but mainly because of the ease of handling. -
Alfred wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 13:56 | replyImagine if he had had to light two candles. Or had had to buy a tin of lighter wall paint. That really would have looked awful.
Translated from Dutch. -
Paul wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 15:01 | replyNice piece. Indeed only entertaining, but if that's not good, you read something else.
Translated from Dutch.
Quite odd that only a few of these are in the catalogues of the "big boys" Kameraexpress and Camera nu.
Always out of reach of my wallet, so I stick to simpler lenses, which are also great nowadays compared to the 70s when I had my first SLR, a Zenth B. Back then, you really had to stop most lenses down to 5.6, or preferably 8, to get sharpness, but I took some beautiful pictures with it! -
Evert wrote on Tuesday 7 December 2021 at 17:37 | replyVery nice lenses for the people who really benefit from them, but I actually wonder what the difference is when I see that you have an expensive Canon lens, 70-200 f2.8, while I bought the one from sigma many times cheaper. Furthermore, I also have a beautiful Sigma 60-600 for under 2000 euros, which is manageable and at the same time suitable for nature and sports photography and, not to forget, also affordable.
Translated from Dutch. -

Peter van Dinther
wrote on Wednesday 8 December 2021 at 18:59
| reply
What might also be an interesting topic is a discussion about anamorphic lenses such as those from Sirui.
Translated from Dutch. -
Paul wrote on Thursday 9 December 2021 at 10:54 | reply@peter van dinther:
Translated from Dutch.
This is certainly NOT an interesting subject for photographers, they are specialist lenses for cinematography, film that is.
Moreover currently heavily overhyped. -

Peter van Dinther
wrote on Thursday 9 December 2021 at 11:11
| reply
@Paul
Translated from Dutch.
Overhyped or not, I have seen some beautiful photos from it. And whatever type of film it is intended for, you can also use it in other ways, right? But yeah, what you can also do is take panoramic photos yourself, but that is a bit more cumbersome. And whether it is worth spending a lot of money on that now is indeed the question. I also think 1499 euros for an anamorphic full-frame lens for, among others, the Sony a73 is rather expensive. But still, interesting from a compositional perspective, hence my question. -

Zeddammer wrote on Thursday 7 May 2026 at 12:09
| reply
Quote: "Do you want a supertelephoto lens with a large aperture? Then the prices rise to more than ten thousand euros."
Translated from Dutch.
Supertelephoto lenses are - and remain - generally expensive. Fortunately, there are alternatives, such as the Sigmonster. The Sigma 300-800mm f/5.6 EX DG HSM, as the lens is called in full, is a lens weighing nearly 6 kilos and cost around 7000 euros new. Nowadays, depending on the condition, they go for around 2,500 euros. I was lucky enough to be able to buy one for 1,400 euros. With this lens, you not only attract a lot of attention, but you also take seriously good photos. They are available in Sigma SA mount, Canon EF mount and Nikon F mount.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,138 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum

