Take fewer portrait photos with a vintage lens

You put into words something that is also a thorn in my (photographer's) eye.
People don't photograph anymore, they just fire away, hoping there'll be a good one among them. I started out shooting analog myself, buying a "roll" from Hema with my pocket money, at the time fl 1.25, you could take 12 photos. Then you were careful. Later 135 film, you had 36 shots, for about fl 3.00. (Everything excluding processing)
I have a daughter who is a wedding photographer, and she comes home with 1000+ photos. When I occasionally did that for acquaintances, I took 6 rolls with me, there was usually 1 left, so about 150-170 shots. But 80% was good, she throws 80% away.....
Recently came across a good Zenit TTL with Helios 44M for a bargain price, and used up a roll with it again, a relief to work so calmly like that.
With an adapter on a mirrorless that will be a little less, but you do gain different insights, and it makes for ( much) less sorting.

A while ago I bought myself a Voigtländer 50 mm F/1.0 to use on my Nikon Z9. Pure enjoyment with this manually operated lens ! And of course I also have lenses with autofocus for doing sports photography and, for example, photographing birds. But I now use that Voigtländer as a replacement for my old Nikon 50 mm F/1.2 (was on my D5). Manual and 50 mm, you don't need more than that to have fun.

I do agree with Cor, focusing on the screen is very difficult, especially if that screen is very touch-sensitive. Nothing beats a good ground glass.
My first SLRs had a pure ground glass, all later ones had "aids", a split-image wedge, or microprisms, including the ones I just scored from my previous message, but the best is that pure ground glass.
The semi-bright image in my Nikon dslr''s does come close, but still doesn't feel like anything.
Screens are hopeless

Digital photos are easy to edit with software such as Photoshop or Picasa. You can correct colors, crop, sharpen and apply creative effects.

Dear Han,
That’s right, but that’s not what it’s about, it’s about the way photographs are taken, the shot itself. Almost everyone nowadays just shoots away, dozens or even hundreds of photos in 1 day of the same subject, only to look at the PC screen afterwards to see if there’s a good one among them.
I started with analog, and I still do it (almost) the same way as I did back then, one or two, sometimes a small series of a subject.but then calmly compose, determine depth of field( if necessary) I leave exposure to the camera, it’s good at that. Only in very difficult situations do I take a few test shots and then check them on the little screen.
Yesterday went to the Eiffel, ,Perlenbachtahl, came back with 170 shots.