Michelle Peeters

Review: Canon EOS R

Friday 24 April 2020, 16:32 by | 9,567 views | 14 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

Canon Nederland gave me the opportunity to test the Canon EOS R. This included the RF 24-105mm, RF 24-240mm and RF 15-35mm lenses, as well as the control ring mount so I could use my own lenses too. These are my findings.

Canon EOS R


Canon launched its first proper mirrorless camera a year ago. With a 30-megapixel full-frame sensor, autofocus with no fewer than 5,655 focus points and a new line of four L lenses with a special RF mount, Canon has brought a camera to the market with solid specifications.

The advantage of the RF mount, compared with the EF mount, is that the lenses sit closer to the sensor. This means they can be considerably faster at similar sizes and weights.

Canon EOS R 10


This camera is positioned between the Canon 5D Mark IV and 6D Mark II. Elja also got to play with it briefly in 2018. He also wrote his own Canon EOS R review earlier.

I was also curious about this camera, hence this additional review. I am also completely used to the DSLR line. I normally work with the Canon EOS 5D Mark III. I can find everything blindly and love the fact that everything is in the same place on this camera.

Canon EOS R


Once it is out of the bag, the EOS R clearly feels a little smaller than my trusted workhorse. It is thinner and, above all, lighter. The grip is still comfortable and it certainly does not feel too small.

I always like being able to feel the weight. The build and body are also solid and pleasant. The flip-out screen is a nice feature too. With my 5D Mark III, I still have to make do with a fixed screen.

This is of course more robust and easier to make weatherproof, and I never really needed it. But I noticed that I actually used it a lot with the EOS R. You can also easily take photos upside down this way.

Canon EOS R 6


Looking at an LCD screen in the viewfinder takes some getting used to, but of course that is the essence of a mirrorless camera. You no longer look directly through the lens. But it all works perfectly well. The image is clear and the colours are beautiful and deep.

You do occasionally see some lag when moving quickly from side to side. The LCD image also sometimes trails slightly. I think this is certainly not due to the quality of the camera, but rather to my lack of experience with it.

Canon EOS R 9


Dual pixel autofocus


Where the EOS R really excels is in its impressive implementation of Dual Pixel AF technology. With no fewer than 5,655 autofocus points and face-detection AF, albeit only in Single-Shot AF, the EOS R has good autofocus capabilities.

Sometimes continuous autofocus and face-recognition AF are still a struggle, but overall the performance is really good.

Face-detection AF also works in automatic/scene mode. A frame is shown around the subject and an AF point appears on every detected face. You can also focus by touching someone's face or another subject on the screen, using Touch AF.

When there is little light, the AF-assist light is activated automatically if necessary. For stationary subjects, a green AF point is shown when the subject is in focus. You also hear a beep, in 1-point AF.

For moving subjects, a blue AF point is shown that follows the subject's movements. The camera does not beep, in Servo AF.

Canon EOS R 8


No in-body image stabilisation


It is a shame that the Canon EOS R does not have in-body image stabilisation. This is useful when shooting in low light and even on a windy day when using a tripod. Some Canon RF lenses have image stabilisation in the lens, but currently only two of the four released RF lenses have this feature.

This also plays a major role when recording video, where the lack of image stabilisation on the EOS R puts it at a considerable disadvantage compared with other full-frame mirrorless cameras such as the Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III.

Canon EOS R 2


Video


Unfortunately, you cannot record 4K video with the EOS R without cropping. The camera takes its video from a 1.83x cropped area of its sensor. But vloggers will certainly appreciate the EOS R's fully articulated flip screen. Via HDMI, you can output 10-bit Log footage to an external recorder.

Canon EOS R 4


Sensor


In terms of resolution, the Canon EOS R has a 30.3-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor. Canon relies on older CMOS sensor technology, which means that dynamic range can be greater and high-ISO images could be captured better compared with other mirrorless cameras.

But in terms of overall performance, the CMOS is capable of excellent image quality.

The EOS R can produce very good images thanks to the 30.3-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor it shares with the EOS 5D Mark IV. If you look at low-ISO images from the EOS R, you will notice excellent levels of detail with good dynamic range and pleasing colours.

As you increase the ISO settings, image quality remains excellent, with a nice balance between fine detail and noise levels. Overall, the EOS R can produce excellent images, but by using an older sensor design, it falls short compared with the Sony A7 III and Nikon Z6.

Canon EOS R 3


Pros


  • Very lightweight construction;
  • Durable, weather-sealed body;
  • Very good grip;
  • Large, high-resolution OLED electronic viewfinder;
  • Beautiful rear LCD screen with polished touchscreen functionality;
  • Fully articulated screen is perfect for vlogging;
  • Interesting FV exposure mode;
  • High image quality from a proven sensor with good dynamic range and very strong high-ISO performance;
  • Pleasing Canon colours;
  • Impressive autofocus in One-Shot AF with the very best focusing in low light;
  • Good autofocus in AI Servo in many situations, although this is very limited by the lack of a live feed in the EVF and low burst speeds;
  • Good buffer depths;
  • 4K video recording up to 30p;
  • HDMI with 10-bit 4:2:2 colour;
  • USB 3.1 Type-C port;
  • Excellent 24-105mm f/4L kit zoom lens;
  • Works very well with adapted EF lenses.


Canon EOS R 12


Cons


  • Weather sealing is not as robust as on the Canon 5D Mark IV;
  • Frustrating ergonomics: poor button placement, no dedicated AF joystick, recessed rear control dial, new Touch Bar is impractical to use;
  • Touch controls are very limiting for taking quick action photos or shooting in cold weather;
  • No IBIS, in-body image stabilisation;
  • Only one SD card slot;
  • Slow buffer clearing times;
  • Top burst speed of 8 fps only available in One-Shot AF. Only 5 fps with continuous autofocus;
  • Evaluative metering is inconsistent;
  • Moderate battery life;
  • Although it still performs well, the sensor has worse high-ISO and dynamic range performance than its competitors;
  • Approximately 1.8x 4K video crop;
  • Severe rolling shutter distortion in 4K video;


Canon EOS R 14


Conclusion


This has become quite a comprehensive review, because I was able to use the camera for a long time. This allowed me to explore many of its possibilities, not all of them, but many. I even checked whether the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth worked properly.

I mainly tried things out by feel and I still do not know everything about the camera, but I do know how it feels, how to work with it and how to operate it. I am certainly very positive about the camera, especially the image quality.

Things such as colour, dynamic range and noise even seem better than on my own 5D Mark III, although I never really had a moment when the difference was very clear to me. The autofocus also works perfectly and accurately. The flip-out screen is great and the camera feels just right.

Solid, but not too large or too heavy. The RF lenses perform very well, feel good and are fast. My own lenses also worked perfectly well via the supplied control ring mount. All in all, excellent performance that can compete with any Canon camera and lens from the higher-end range.

Canon EOS R 7


My only reservation is the handling. Especially at first, I often had to search for the right button. I often did not find it very intuitive. I do find the shortcuts on my 5D Mark III very useful.

It is also inconvenient that you often unintentionally change your focus point and other camera settings. But on closer inspection, it turned out that you can lock this, so that was a matter of studying the manual properly.

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Michelle Peeters

About the author

Michelle Peeters is fotografe en oprichter van DeuxBleus Fotografie. Michelle herkent het bijzondere in het gewone en het gewone in het bijzondere. Ze heeft zich nooit willen specialiseren en is daardoor van alle markten thuis.

You might also like

Show every article in Reviews

14 comments

  1. Huub
    Huub wrote on Friday 24 April 2020 at 17:24  | reply

    I also took a look at it, particularly at the remote WiFi and Bluetooth connection. It all works, but it remains a bit tricky to get everything configured properly. And here too, it is a shame that the WiFi range is so short, meaning you still have to stay fairly close to the camera if you want to control the whole thing via your smartphone.

    Translated from Dutch.
  2. Pieter
    Pieter wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 14:54  | reply

    It's a shame that there's no mention of the banding that occurs in low light and the silent shutter.

    Translated from Dutch.
  3. Michelle Peeters
    Profile Michelle Peeters wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 14:59  | reply

    @Pieter: I haven't experienced any banding when using this camera myself. But that may be because I always shoot in raw. I don't know if you shoot in jpg and also edit your 8-bit jpgs extensively? I think the camera handles high iso values very well!

    Translated from Dutch.
  4. Pieter
    Pieter wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 15:13  | reply

    Michelle: maybe I should start shooting in raw. I never do, don't even know if it will help and how it works. I only photograph with the R in poorly lit jazz clubs, etc. with the silent shutter and high ISO (to keep the shutter speed high). Photos already come out of the camera with banding, processing has nothing to do with it. It's caused by the interaction between the frequency of the electronic shutter and the artificial light in the venue.

    Translated from Dutch.
  5. Michelle Peeters
    Profile Michelle Peeters wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 15:15  | reply

    @Pieter: ok I didn't know that yet! But I have to say that I haven't used it in poorly lit rooms with artificial light. So I'm curious about your experiences when you start shooting in raw! I personally find that silent shutter a huge help, also for wildlife photography!

    Translated from Dutch.
  6. paul
    paul wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 15:53  | reply

    I think your review is very good Michelle! I myself have had this eos r camera for 1.5 years and am super happy with it. I also had to get used to the buttons at first, but I no longer have any problem with them.
    Pieter, I always photograph in raw and have never experienced banding and sometimes I also photograph in poorly lit spaces.

    Translated from Dutch.
  7. Michelle Peeters
    Profile Michelle Peeters wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 16:06  | reply

    @Paul: thanks! But I haven't tried out all situations, which is also a bit difficult during these corona times of course.. What have your experiences been with noise at high ISO values with this camera? And when photographing in poorly lit spaces with artificial light? It's interesting to know how much detail the camera can capture at high ISO values. You can often remove the noise quite well in post-processing (while also retaining details)!

    Translated from Dutch.
  8. Pieter
    Pieter wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 16:10  | reply

    yes that's a great solution because I also shoot at quiet concerts and I'm standing among the audience. I'll try RAW, but this camera seems to be made for photographing without flash in concert halls. Just have a look at: Jazzgigs concerten 2019 en 2020. I photograph with the EOS R and the 5DmarkIV

    Translated from Dutch.
  9. Michelle Peeters
    Profile Michelle Peeters wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 16:14  | reply

    @Pieter: beautiful photos and that without flash! Lots of detail, beautiful colors and I see little to no noise!

    Translated from Dutch.
  10. paul
    paul wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 16:35  | reply

    Michelle, I have little trouble with noise and if I feel I have a bit too much noise, I can easily get rid of it in LR. I rarely go above ISO 3200, and by working with high-quality L lenses, I usually manage with ISO 1600 in spaces with less light. I have been attending evening photography school for a few years and am in no way inferior to other camera brands used by students and which would supposedly be better with noise in some reviews.

    Translated from Dutch.
  11. Pieter
    Pieter wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 16:45  | reply

    from, let's say, the beginning of 2019 it was shot with the 5D4 or the R. Can be found on the right. Unfortunately or fortunately (?) it's far from always there: that banding. Depends enormously on the light and the amount of it and only with the electronic shutter! But all cameras with an electronic shutter from other brands have that too.

    Paul: I'm going to focus on RAW for a moment!

    The photos on my site: I kept getting a better camera!

    Translated from Dutch.
  12. Pieter
    Pieter wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 17:27  | reply

    Paul: you can go to ISO 5000 without any problems with the R (and also the 5D4)! Even much higher gives acceptable results. Just give it a try. It does have to be really dark then!

    Translated from Dutch.
  13. Pieter
    Pieter wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 20:17  | reply

    with all due respect Michelle, but the camera is expensive and can also take photos under extreme conditions. Canon advertises that too. That's why I bought it as well. In my opinion, for a test you should get everything out of it that it has to offer. You could have used the 28-70mm 2.0 lens too in my opinion.

    Translated from Dutch.
  14. Michelle Peeters
    Profile Michelle Peeters wrote on Tuesday 28 April 2020 at 20:43  | reply

    @Pieter: that's right and he shows that too, value for money! I used all the lenses, including my own 70-200 f/2.8 + 2.0 extender on it.

    Translated from Dutch.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Become a better photographer every week

A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,027 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via Facebook. Sign-up secured with Google reCaptcha.

Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it