
What to consider when switching photo editing software
Saturday 1 August 2026, 22:44 by Nando Harmsen | 1,338 views | 11 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
You have been using the same photo editing software for years. Then you decide to switch to different software. That never goes completely smoothly. There are things you need to consider. Think carefully before taking the step. There can be various reasons for switching to a different photo editing programme. Whatever the reason, you would rather not start again with all the edits you have made to years' worth of images. The tools available to you for photo editing are virtually the same in all photo editing software. The differences are often in the details and the appearance of the programme. Using different software can require perseverance. You not only have to find the tools you need, you also have to develop a new workflow. Give yourself time to learn how to work with the new software. Especially when you see that the results are to your liking, that can be very motivating. There is only one sticking point: what do you do with all the photos you edited in the past?

The problem is actually very simple to describe. You lose all your past edits. The edits you made to your raw files cannot be read by the new software. There are, of course, the sidecar files. The XMP files, DOP files or other small files that contain editing information. Unfortunately, often only keywords and star ratings can be read by other software.

The only way to preserve your old edits is to export them to a jpeg or tiff file. Unfortunately, nothing can ever be adjusted again after that. The edit is final. Of course, you can edit the original raw file again in the new software. That works perfectly for a hundred or so photos, but not for many thousands of photos. There is, however, another workaround.

Make a fresh start when switching to new photo editing software. From that moment on, edit all new photos in the new software. Ignore all the 'old' photos and leave them to the old software. This means that the old photos can still be viewed in the old software and exported from there. So do not throw away the old software, but continue using it to manage the old photos. I have previously written about using Lightroom Classic without a subscription. Read about it in this article. Software you have purchased can be used indefinitely anyway.

If you wish, you can always bring a select number of 'old photos' to the new software. You can then edit them again. If you do not want to do that, leave them in the old software. Switching to new software is relatively simple. Do make sure you understand the consequences for your 'old photos' and edits. Then ask yourself whether switching is worth it. Only you can make that choice. Also consider the cost of the software you use or want to use. You can find a price comparison of the professionally oriented software packages that also include photo management in this article. Have you switched software? Or are you thinking about switching? I am very curious to hear how you are going to do this, or how you solved it. Share your experiences or ideas in a comment below. Perhaps you will bring new insights that we can all learn from.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
Fashion photo tip: Plan the light you wantby Anniek Snoeijs
-
An honest comparison between DxO PhotoLab and Lightroom Classicby Nando Harmsen
-
Avoid Blurry Photos With These 10 Tipsby Nando Harmsen
-
What's the most annoying thing about your camera?by Nando Harmsen
-
Forget full-frame as the holy grailby Nando Harmsen
11 comments
-
guest wrote on Monday 3 August 2026 at 17:13 | replyXMP-bestanden verwijderen, krijg je "schone" RAW's. Toch?
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet. -

-
Hans wrote on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at 12:53 | replyAffinity is een geweldig fotobewerkingsprogramma en bovendien gratis. Het heeft alles wat Photoshop ook biedt. Behalve de AI functies. Maar wees eerlijk: fotograferen en bewerken met behulp van AI is een kunstje. Echte fotografen doen dat niet.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet. -

-
Trudy wrote on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at 17:34 | replyEind dit jaar wil ik Lightroom opzeggen, omdat ik veel onhebbelijkheden mbt de bibliotheek heb, zoals bij het importeren van foto’s, waarbij het programma niet onthoudt, dat foto’s van een voorgaande import niet opnieuw moeten worden geïmporteerd, ondanks dat aangevinkt is ‘dubbele foto’s niet importeren’. Exporteren van een rawfoto naar jpg kan maar 1 keer; een 2e keer dezelfde foto gaat niet lukken. In de ontwikkel modus is het programma traag in het tonen van de volgende foto. Dus voor mij is LR classic niet meer wat het was.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
Ik heb een app gevonden voor het beheren van de foto’s, speciaal voor mac-gebruikers en ontwikkel de foto’s in Affinity Photo 3 en eventueel Pixelmator Pro. Ik ben nog van plan om PureRaw6 en de Nikcollectie voor Affinity van DxO aan te schaffen. -

-
Govaerts wrote on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at 18:20 | replyIk heb in het volwassenenonderwijs te Antwerpen leren werken met photoshop en ik zie echt de reden niet in waarom ik zou moeten veranderen.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet. -

Nando
wrote on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at 18:27
| reply
Precies mijn gedachte. Eerlijk gezegd denk ik dat er veel mensen overstappen uit principe. Adobe is de grote boosdoener.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
Ik weet het, een gevaarlijke mening die heel wat reacties kan opleveren.
-
Hans wrote on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at 20:37 | replyIk begrijp dat Nando een liefhebber van Lightroom is. Dat mag. Ik vermoed dat hij Affinity niet volledig beheerst. Zelfs DXO gebruikers stappen over naar Affinity.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet. -

Nando
wrote on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at 21:43
| reply
Dit is onzin. Affinity is geen Lightroom. Affinity is als Photoshop. Ze werken totaal anders en zijn niet te vergelijken.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
Verdiep je er eens in, Hans. Dan begrijp je wat ik bedoel.
Het idee dat ik het programma niet beheers... Ik heb er op Photofacts Academy een hele cursus over gemaakt en vervolg cursussen zijn in de maak. Ik raad het programma aan iedereen aan, die geen Adobe heeft of wil hebben. -
Victor wrote on Friday 7 August 2026 at 15:23 | replyWat jammer. Dit was een mooi artikel geweest om ook eens open source fotografie tools te bespreken. Er is veel gaande. Zo is in juni de nieuwe versie van Darktable, 5.6 uitgekomen met o.a. AI denoising en selecties. Rawtherapy, ook net een nieuwe versie, 5.13, is ook populair. RapidRaw en Safelight zijn nieuwe loten aan de open source tak die heel snel ontwikkeld worden(pun intended)
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
Persoonlijk ben ik in 2024 na 16 jaar Photoshop en Lightroom volledig overgestapt op Darktable en Krita/Gimp, niet in de laatste plaats omdat Darktable echt bijna alles biedt dat Lightroom heeft en in sommige opzichten zelfs veelzijdig is. Bovendien draait het op Linux, Mac én Windows. Geen licentie kosten is ook heel fijn.
Ik wil best eens helpen met een artikel over open source tools
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Elja Trum


