
A large aperture is not just for a shallow depth of field
Wednesday 8 June 2022, 15:30 by Nando Harmsen | 4,801 views | 1 commentThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
You know those beautiful and often very expensive lenses with huge apertures. If you already consider f/2.8 large, it is nothing compared with f/1.4 or even f/1.2. They give you an extremely shallow depth of field.
But what use is such a large aperture if you always shoot at f/8? I explain what else a large aperture is useful for.
Not everyone wants to use an extremely shallow depth of field. That is understandable, because it is not suitable for every type of photography.
Photographers who almost always use an aperture between f/5.6 and f/11 in particular will not quickly see the point of f/1.4.

Yet a very large aperture can be very useful. Not to achieve a shallow depth of field. Nor to let enough light through the lens in dark conditions so that you can keep shooting. It has everything to do with focusing.
We do not often stop to think about it, but autofocus has its limitations. Contrast is needed to focus.
If there is no contrast, focusing will fail. The autofocus will hunt. If there is contrast, there still needs to be enough light to see that contrast.

Every camera needs a minimum amount of light to focus. This is shown as an EV value.
For example, a camera's autofocus may work down to -2 EV. If it is darker than -2 EV, the AF is no longer usable.

This figure of -2 EV is completely arbitrary in this case, just an example. Each camera has its own minimum light level listed in the specifications. For some it is -1 EV, while others go down to -3 EV. Some even go down to -7 EV. In this case, I will stick with -2 EV as an example.
The amount of light corresponding to -2 EV is the amount of light from a full moon in a snowy landscape. There is one catch, though. The camera can only focus in these conditions with an f/1.2 lens. That is a requirement because this lens can let through enough light.
If you had an f/4 lens, focusing under a full moon in a snowy landscape would no longer work. After all, an f/4 lens lets through no less than 3.3 stops less light.
This means that with a lens with a maximum aperture of f/4, you can only focus at around 1 EV instead of -2 EV.

To give you an idea, 1 EV of light roughly corresponds to the night-time skyline of a city in the distance. If you have a lens with a maximum aperture of f/5.6, you will need at least +2 EV of light. That corresponds to shooting in a city with street lighting.
If you shoot a lot in dark conditions, you can certainly benefit from a lens with a large aperture. Focusing can be much better, faster and smoother in those situations. The risk of the focus hunting is much smaller.

Does this mean you always need a lens with a large aperture? Of course not. It is only useful if you shoot in conditions where the light is anything but optimal. Or if you like an extremely shallow depth of field, because that is an option too.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
Focusing on Large Groups of Animalsby Nando Harmsen
-
Street photography tip: Use zone focusingby Michiel Heijmans
-
Focusing for action shotsby Nico Delmeire
-
Never focus again, not even automaticallyby Nando Harmsen
-
Better autofocus with a wide apertureby Nando Harmsen
-
Is Adobe Photoshop still focused on photography?by Nando Harmsen
1 comment
-

Donald Willemsen
wrote on Thursday 16 June 2022 at 22:59
| reply
Ik vind het een tof artikel Nando. Een objectief met een grotere lensopnening dan F/2.8 is lang niet altijd nodig. Die objectieven zijn vaak ook een stuk duurder, waarbij de 50mm vast brandpunt van Canon een van de uitzonderingen is. Die is zelfs in de 'plastic fantastic' versie erg goedkoop te noemen. Het is ook de enige lens met een grotere lensopening dan F/2.8 die ik heb. De rest is allemaal minder lichtsterk. Dat is niet altijd handig, maar je moet nu eenmaal roeien met de riemen die je hebt. Met de objectieven die ik heb, kan ik me goed redden in de soort fotografie die ik beoefen. Een grote DoF heb ik nu eenmaal vaker nodig dat een kleine DoF.
This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,178 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum

