Elja Trum

How Scratch-Resistant Is a Camera Sensor?

Saturday 11 July 2020, 23:32 by | 6,524 views | 5 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

Most photographers are careful with the sensor in their camera. They put the body cap on when there is no lens attached, and so on. But how sensitive is a camera sensor really? YouTuber Arthur R tests it with dust, sand, oil and a knife.


A bit painful to watch, especially the knife. Unfortunately, we don't get to see whether his actions might have any effect on the image.

Generally, you could say that your sensor can take quite a bit. As long as you don't scratch your sensor with a knife, that is.

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Elja Trum

About the author

Elja Trum is the founder of Photofacts and online photography course website Photofacts Academy. He has been writing about photography since 2006. Elja is also the author of (Dutch) books on composition, black-and-white photography, flash photography and portrait photography.

Show every article in Video

5 comments

  1. Herman Lambers
    Herman Lambers wrote on Tuesday 14 July 2020 at 14:22  | reply

    In my opinion, you can never damage the sensor because it is protected behind a filter. If that were not the case, a speck of dust would not be blurred by a wide aperture either. These dust particle are therefore not on the sensor but on the filter.

    Translated from Dutch.
  2. Will Herlaar
    Will Herlaar wrote on Tuesday 14 July 2020 at 18:00  | reply

    Not entirely true Herman. When I change lenses on my Fujifilm X-T3 you look straight at the sensor...no filter or anything like that.

    Translated from Dutch.
  3. Maikel
    Profile Maikel wrote on Tuesday 14 July 2020 at 20:08  | reply

    there's always an IR filter in your camera, right on the sensor. that looks like the sensor but there's actually still a thin glass plate on it. with astrophotography that filter has to be removed to also be able to photograph H alpha (hydrogen deep red) this is mostly blocked by that filter..

    Translated from Dutch.
  4. Paul Oosterlaak
    Profile Paul Oosterlaak wrote on Wednesday 15 July 2020 at 13:45  | reply

    In fact: there is an IR filter, a UV filter and another relatively thick glass plate in front of the sensor.
    With some cameras it unfortunately also happens that dust gets under the glass plate. So that dust cannot really be removed with sensor cleaning either, meaning it has to be sent back.

    Translated from Dutch.
  5. Paul Oosterlaak
    Profile Paul Oosterlaak wrote on Wednesday 15 July 2020 at 13:57  | reply

    A word about the video:
    In the beginning he goes over the sensor with a sensor swab while the camera is not yet in cleaning mode, causing him to move the sensor rather vigorously. Not exactly a smart thing to do.
    He also acts as if almost nothing can damage a sensor, but I have seen sensors with small scratches often enough. Usually caused by people who tried to clean their sensor (incorrectly).

    Translated from Dutch.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Become a better photographer every week

A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,023 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via Facebook. Sign-up secured with Google reCaptcha.

Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it