Nando Harmsen

Low-key is an edit, not underexposure

Monday 24 March 2025, 15:51 by | 5,210 views | 6 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

We all know the terms high-key and low-key. These are photos that are mainly made up of highlights (high-key) or shadows (low-key). This is not overexposure or underexposure, though. I explain how I edited a low-key photo.

I often see photos labelled low-key and think: they're just underexposed. There are no light tones in them at all. Even things that would normally be white have a dark grey appearance.

Low-key is not underexposure. It is a photo that mainly consists of dark tones. So mainly the tones that sit to the left of the middle in a histogram. That does not mean there cannot be any highlights in it, though.

Nando 2022 low key puffin 5

Underexposure is not the way to create a low-key photo. That is not how it works.

Nando 2022 low key puffin 4

A correctly exposed photo of a puffin, unedited. The dark feathers and background are perfect for a low-key edit

A photo must be suitable for editing into a low-key image. The photo must already be dark. But it must not be underexposed. The exposure has to be right. The low-key look comes from the edit.

For this example, I chose a puffin against a dark blue background. The photo is exposed for the light parts, so it is correctly exposed. I cropped it to keep the second bird out of the frame. This creates a nice portrait.

After cropping, it is a matter of editing the photo. The head can be made a little lighter, while the breast should be darker, with a gradient down to very dark. The contrast needs to be optimal. In Lightroom, I achieved this edit with masks.

Nando 2022 low key puffin 2

A preliminary low-key edit. I even made the head as light as possible so that the contrast with the dark parts of the photo would be as strong as possible.

Although low-key photos can be presented perfectly well in colour, we often associate low-key with black and white. I think that would also look very good with this photo. I decide to create a powerful black-and-white version of the photo.

Nando 2022 low key puffin

The final result of my low-key edit of this puffin


If you have set the exposure correctly, you still have the option of not turning it into a low-key photo. That is of course fine too. The choice is yours. But if the photo was already underexposed, it becomes very difficult or even impossible.

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Nando Harmsen

About the author

Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.

Show every article in Photo recipes

6 comments

  1. Donald Willemsen
    Donald Willemsen wrote on Monday 24 March 2025 at 22:25  | reply

    I mainly have experience making low-key portraits in the studio and in black and white. With a good lighting setup in the studio, you almost immediately get a low-key photo that you don't have to edit into it again in post-processing. Of course, it doesn't work that way when you photograph outdoors in nature. After all, the light often comes from several directions there.

    Translated from Dutch.
  2. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 25 March 2025 at 09:27  | reply

    If you have full control over the light, it is indeed possible to get it almost right directly in the camera.

    Translated from Dutch.
  3. Bob
    Bob wrote on Tuesday 25 March 2025 at 11:20  | reply

    With strong contrasts in nature (usually not desirable, but definitely handy now), you can also create low key in the field. Just think of a great egret in the sunshine against a dark bank, for example.

    Translated from Dutch.
  4. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 25 March 2025 at 11:28  | reply

    Why is high contrast usually not desirable in nature? I often find that much more beautiful than everything in the midtones. That great egret is a good example of that. This photo is comparable, of course.

    Translated from Dutch.
  5. Thierry Hoornaert
    Thierry Hoornaert wrote on Wednesday 26 March 2025 at 13:20  | reply

    With high/low key, may the background be purely white/dark, or is it supposed to remain entirely within the range? I recently did a photoshoot with a white background in which the model wore an (almost) white dress with even whiter accents at the seams. The photo was predominantly white, without being overexposed. It was praised by the group as a perfectly exposed photo, but rejected as high-key. Same for the black background and dress.

    Translated from Dutch.
  6. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Thursday 27 March 2025 at 00:51  | reply

    Without seeing the photo itself, it's impossible to judge that. I do know that the criteria of groups, clubs and individuals sometimes take strange (and extreme) forms.
    Pure black or white should usually not be a problem. It does depend on the image.

    Translated from Dutch.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.

Become a better photographer every week

A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,179 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via Facebook. Sign-up secured with Google reCaptcha.

Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it