
A panorama should add value
Monday 19 May 2025, 20:02 by Nando Harmsen | 2,757 views | 2 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
You can create a photo with a field of view of up to 360 degrees. This is a panorama, made by stitching several photos together. Use this technique when it adds value.
When you're in a beautiful place, everything around you may be worth photographing. A panorama can be a way to capture everything around you. You divide the entire view across several photos, which you merge later.
Aim for around 30% overlap, and keep your camera in a vertical position. This allows you to capture 180 degrees, 270 degrees or even a full 360 degrees. But that doesn't mean it produces a better photo.

For much photography, a wide-angle or ultra-wide-angle lens is already too much. With a panorama, you take it one step further. You do get a photo with enormous resolution, but if you don't do much more with it than display it on a screen, that isn't much use.
A panorama is often a very narrow, long image, with everything shown even smaller than with an ultra-wide-angle lens. It does give you an overview, but it often lacks a good composition. As a photo, it is therefore often not very exciting.

Use a panorama only when it adds value. And you don't have to go all the way around. More isn't better. Also pay attention to the composition. Where do you start and where do you finish? Do you have something in the foreground, or can you use leading lines?

Instead of a panorama, it can be worthwhile to capture everything in several photos. Separate photos that together show more than one single narrow, long photo.
So be critical when making a panorama. Only do it when it genuinely adds value.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
The Biggest Disadvantage of a Panoramaby Nando Harmsen
-
Ten tips for panorama photographyby Nando Harmsen
-
Photographing or cropping a panoramaby Nando Harmsen
-
When to use which type of panorama?by Nando Harmsen
-
10 Tips for a Handheld Panoramaby Nando Harmsen
-
A vertical panorama for a wider angleby Nando Harmsen
2 comments
-
Donald Willemsen wrote on Tuesday 20 May 2025 at 11:30 | replyTo create panoramas, I increasingly use a telephoto lens and the camera in portrait orientation. I find the advantage that a telephoto lens does not render things as reduced as a wide-angle lens. You also see more detail and the photo does not become too narrow when you have to crop away some of the top and bottom. That way I can show a bit more than the usual field of view with the camera in landscape orientation. I usually use 3 to 5 photos to put the panorama together.
Translated from Dutch.
I took the 'panorama photography' course and it certainly made me wiser. It is highly recommended. -

Nando
wrote on Sunday 25 May 2025 at 10:12
| reply
A panorama with a telephoto lens delivers exactly the same result as a wide-angle lens (provided the angle of view is the same). It is just as small in the image. With a panorama, you only have more resolution at your disposal. So you can zoom in more.
Translated from Dutch.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
39,179 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum

