Nando Harmsen

Cropping is good, but don't overdo it with animal photos

Monday 12 May 2025, 16:16 by | 4,572 views | 5 comments

This article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.

Cropping is good. It lets you create a beautiful composition that wasn't possible in the field. It allows you to put the finishing touches to the composition. But when it comes to animal photos, don't overdo it.

I often see enthusiastic wildlife photographers crop a photo heavily. This is often because they didn't have the desired focal length. Cropping gives you an enlarged view of the animal. There's nothing wrong with that.

Until the cropping becomes extreme. An animal digitally cropped so tightly that it's visible from nose or beak to tail. The edges of the photo are just barely avoided. That's a shame.

Nando fieldfare extreme crop

I often don't think extreme cropping is the best choice.

Of course, everyone has to decide for themselves, but I'm convinced that an animal needs room to breathe. There needs to be space to show the habitat, the surroundings. That gives you the opportunity to tell a story.

Nando fieldfare normal crop

Show the surroundings, and the photo will tell more.


An animal shown from edge to edge is good for a biology book, or an identification guide. It's an impersonal representation of the animal. Show more in the frame, and the photo comes to life.

It's not a black-and-white story, of course. It doesn't mean you can never frame an animal this tightly. Do think about what you want to say with the photo. And choose what you think is best. Because sometimes a real portrait of an animal is beautiful too. But then we're talking about a form of portrait photography.

Nando animals in landscape

I prefer landscape photos with animals in them. How large or small the animals should be depends on the photo.

Then there's another potential problem that may come into play. Cropping means throwing away resolution. High-resolution sensors give you plenty of room to work with, but remember that extreme cropping also amplifies lens flaws and noise.

If you crop extremely, you may even think that a camera is poor when it comes to noise. But it's much more likely that the cause is an extreme crop.

Are you a wildlife photographer? Let us know what you do when cropping an image. How much of the photo do you want the animal to fill?

Share: WhatsApp Facebook
Nando Harmsen

About the author

Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.

Show every article in Tips and tricks

5 comments

  1. Willem
    Willem wrote on Tuesday 13 May 2025 at 13:07  | reply

    Onze hond is mijn model. Ik vind het mooi als ik zijn kop beeldvullend in beeld heb. Echter een totaal van het dier is ook niet verkeerd. Met mijn 18-400 (Tamron) hoef ik niet te croppen.

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  2. Nando
    Profile Nando wrote on Tuesday 13 May 2025 at 13:17  | reply

    Voor een huisdier fotograferen is croppen meestal minder van toepassing. Je kan er op 1 meter vanaf staan, of 10 meter. Je kan inzoomen als het nodig is, of uitzoomen.
    Echter, ik weet uit ervaring dat je soms een foto van een mooi moment maakt waarbij je achteraf denkt: die zou wat meer close-up moeten zijn. In dat geval is croppen een mogelijkheid. Ook met een 18-400mm.
    En dan geldt ook: ga niet te ver daarin.

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  3. Joke vd Berg
    Joke vd Berg wrote on Tuesday 13 May 2025 at 14:38  | reply

    Ik vind het wel een goede artikel, want ik ben zelf idd geneigd om best veel te croppen, ik zal hier in het vervolg beter op letten!

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  4. guest wrote on Tuesday 13 May 2025 at 15:28  | reply

    Ik gebruik mijn telelens ook vaak voor libellen en vlinders die net te ver weg zitten voor de macrolens. Ook met de minimale scherpstelafstand van zo'n 90 cm hou je dan nog weleens wat teveel ruimte over... croppen doe ik dus regelmatig maar wel altijd in de rawconverter en dan goed opletten op de kwaliteit. Belangrijk daarin blijft een goede compo en leefruimte voor het beestje, wat dat betreft ben ik het helemaal met je eens.
    gr Ron

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.
  5. Joseph
    Joseph wrote on Tuesday 13 May 2025 at 18:09  | reply

    Ik maak veel foto's van vliegende vogels en de achtergrond is dan lucht en de vogels zijn dan klein. Dus croppen maar !!

    This comment was written in another language and has not been translated yet.

Have your say

Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.
Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Elja Trum

Elja Trum

Photofacts; everything to do with photography!

Would you like to take better photos and keep up with what is happening in photography? Photofacts publishes articles that teach you something about photography — from a product announcement to a practical shooting tip or a look at a website. Photofacts covers photography every day and is a hobby project of Elja Trum's that got out of hand. The articles are written by a team of volunteer authors. If you would enjoy writing one or more articles for Photofacts, do get in touch.More about Photofacts

Photofacts is made possible in part by


We use cookies to make Photofacts work properly. Read our cookie policy. got it