
Do you have a mirrorless camera? Watch out for lasers
Friday 28 August 2020, 16:08 by Nando Harmsen | 5,797 views | 4 commentsThis article was translated from Dutch with the help of AI. Read the original.
Concert photography is something I did for decades, from the early 1990s until a few years ago. It is a wonderful thing to do, and I enjoyed it immensely.

In the final years of my 'career' as a concert photographer, lasers became increasingly popular. More and more artists used these versatile light sources to create spectacular light shows. And they became affordable.
But in the end, they turned out to pose a real danger to the photographer and their camera, as I experienced at first hand.
You don't need to react as dramatically as the singer of the band Helloween. But do pay attention.
A few years ago, after a concert, I went to photograph the aftershow, where lasers were used extensively. The laser beams shoot rapidly back and forth, and can project beautiful patterns in the smoky concert hall. This can produce very photogenic moments.
To capture the laser patterns, a longer shutter speed is desirable. This gives the laser time to travel a distance and draw the pattern while the shutter is open. A fast shutter speed freezes the moment, as it were, and the patterns will not be visible.
So I decided to experiment with long shutter speeds, up to one second. The idea was also to show the movement of dancing people.
Strange spots in the photo
Besides concert photography, I also spend a lot of time photographing landscapes, and I still do. Shortly after the concert, I noticed a few spots in the photo. After looking more closely, I found that they were present in all the photos. They did not look like dust, but like something else.
Then it dawned on me that the laser had damaged my sensor.


I decided to have my camera repaired. The damage could be repaired, but a new sensor had to be installed. The damage cost more than 500 euros.
Fortunately, I was insured against damage to my equipment, and I was reimbursed for most of it. But the lesson was clear: watch out for lasers.
What about mirrorless cameras?
Now that mirrorless cameras have become commonplace, I have realised that the danger lasers pose to these cameras is greater than it was with the old, trusted DSLRs.
With the latter, the sensor is only exposed to light when the photo is taken. Normally, there is a mirror and a shutter in front of it.

Mirrorless cameras have no mirror or shutter. The sensor is used to display the image in the viewfinder and on the LCD screen. So it is continuously exposed to light.
If you are at a venue where lasers are being used, the sensor will always be exposed to laser light. Even when the camera is switched off, with some exceptions.
In other words, because the sensor is always exposed to light, the chance of a laser damaging the sensor is many times greater. After all, it is not only exposed during the moment of taking a photograph, as with a DSLR.
Less danger in normal situations. Or is it?
You probably think you will never find yourself in a situation where lasers can damage your sensor. After all, not everyone photographs at parties or concerts, and not every party or concert uses lasers.
However, there are other places where lasers are also used, and you do not always know about it. Did you know that self-driving cars also use, or may use, lasers? Or laser speed checks by the police, where there have been known cases of mirrorless cameras being damaged.
Take a look at the ILDA website, where you can read more about this danger, or at this news report on the BCC.
In practice
I do not want to cause you unnecessary concern as a mirrorless camera user, because I expect that there is no danger at all in 99% of the moments when you are taking photographs. Certainly not with certain types of photography.
However, it is good to be aware of the possible dangers posed by lasers. And with increasing automation and the use of autonomous systems, lasers can appear in places where you do not expect them. It would be unfortunate if your camera suddenly suffered damage, as mine did back then.
A photographer who has been warned is worth two.

About the author
Nando Harmsen has been photographing for more than 40 years. He specialises in wedding photography and landscape photography. Nando also gives talks, workshops, masterclasses and photo trips, and regularly reviews new and interesting equipment.
You might also like
-
The mirrorless camera and the looming lack of exposure knowledgeby Nando Harmsen
-
Review: Canon EOS R full-frame mirrorless cameraby Elja Trum
-
The battle between DSLRs and mirrorless camerasby Michelle Peeters
-
Nikon introduces the Z6 III mirrorless cameraby Nando Harmsen
-
Review: Sony A7R V mirrorless cameraby Nando Harmsen
-
The DSLR is dead, long live the mirrorless camera!by Elja Trum
4 comments
-
Bob Bakker wrote on Monday 31 August 2020 at 14:50 | replyHi Nando, thanks for this warning.
Translated from Dutch.
Thinking about that further: It doesn't have to be laser light only. Because the sensor is basically always on (when the camera is switched on), you could also get damage if, for example, you briefly put it down in a place where the sun is shining into the lens. Or am I seeing that wrong?
Regards, Bob Bakker -

Paul Oosterlaak wrote on Monday 31 August 2020 at 22:50
| reply
Sunlight is generally not intense enough to burn into a sensor, unless you have, for example, a long telephoto lens attached to it. Though I doubt whether that is enough for your sensor.
Translated from Dutch.
Lasers used by self-driving cars generally use wavelengths reasonably far outside visible light. There is almost always an IR and UV filter on the sensor that can already block quite a lot. But there are always wavelengths that pass through and are nevertheless dangerous for the sensor.
I have it myself with my Canon 5D II, which has also had a "watermark" from being in a nightclub years ago. -

Nando
wrote on Tuesday 1 September 2020 at 17:07
| reply
@Bob;
Translated from Dutch.
Sunlight itself isn't harmful if your camera is lying in the sun. I assume you aren't pointing the lens directly at the sun. Still, with an ultra-wide-angle lens I would place the camera facing away from the sun, especially if this is for a longer period of time. I don't think it will cause any damage, but why take the risk. By the way, pointing it at the sun briefly, for a photo, is also harmless, unless your focal length is very long. -

Donald Willemsen
wrote on Tuesday 1 September 2020 at 23:15
| reply
A good warning, Nando. It does make you think when you want to switch from a DSLR to a mirrorless camera. Of course, that does depend somewhat on the type of photography you practice.
Translated from Dutch.
Have your say
Please note: Articles older than a week can only be commented on by signed-in visitors.Would you still like to comment? sign in or create a free account.
Become a better photographer every week
A practical photography tip in your inbox every week.
38,937 photography enthusiasts already receive the tips! More about the weekly mail. Or keep up to date via
Facebook.

Elja Trum

